Would you liberals be upset at her for cutting the funding to all those social programs, like Bill did?
You know, the ones that Bush gave funding back to.
I thought you democrats were into social programs?
2006-07-01 11:07:36 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
JOHN J, THAT IS A FLAT OUT LIE
BUSH HAS GIVEN MORE MONEY TO SOCIAL PROGRAMS THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT.
For example:
http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/01-2000/wh-0127.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/09/20040902-3.html
2006-07-01 11:21:54 · update #1
'lefts are shades of middle',, lmao omg, if the left goes any farther left, I will be considered a liberal!
2006-07-01 11:23:25 · update #2
C'mon, Nick, you ought to know by now that you can't reason with libs. They just make up lies and refuse to look at the truth even if there's proof. If they didn't do that, they'd have to rethink their entire point of view.
2006-07-01 11:26:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The only 'social' program Bush has added any significant amount of money to is the Military. Every other program has recieved huge cuts, or been underfunded from inception (see "No Child Left Behind")
As far as Hilary being elected, I hope, as a liberal (btw. liberal does not mean democrat, it means someone that votes for freedom) for everyone's sake it doesn't happen.
2006-07-01 18:13:20 · answer #2 · answered by John J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all which programs do you speak of, second of all, one can not assume she would, nor could she in some areas w/o approval of Congress, third you use liberal and lump Hillary as a liberal, she like most on the right and left are just shades of the middle anyway.
2006-07-01 18:15:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
America will only vote in a Conservative woman president ,and not in the near future .Liberals are screwing up this country and the world with there head buried in the sand approach to reason. If that broad is elected its to late for this country and is the beginning of the end for the USA as we know it
2006-07-01 18:26:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you Republicans hate social programs... why is he giving the funding back? And are your numbers adjusted for inflation? A real "increase" may be a decrease in 2000 dollars...
... and let's remember... a Republican congress probably had a lot to do with any cuts under Clinton...
2006-07-01 18:19:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, I"m not into the political party thing. I hated both of the Clintons, and after being in Iraq for so long, I hate Bush just as well. I hope she doesn't become the next president. I think it'll be a disaster.........
2006-07-01 18:20:03 · answer #6 · answered by cajunrescuemedic 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what she did. But I doubt America is ready for a women preisident while in or directly after a War, she has the ablity to be a preisident in a few years, as long as she doesn't upset to many of her own party. maybe switch sides.
2006-07-01 18:12:37 · answer #7 · answered by theaterhanz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would scrutinize a Democratic president just as much as I scrutinize the current Republican president.
2006-07-01 18:59:24 · answer #8 · answered by Duffman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if Hilary is president pigs are flying politicians are looking out for the publics interest
and slick willy is head to the cigar store
2006-07-01 18:12:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Major throw up to see her elected. Bleeeccchhhhh!
2006-07-01 18:13:06 · answer #10 · answered by homeschoolmama 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋