in hinged handcuffs behind her back...if you have ever been in them, you know they are not forgiving at all...the allow for no movement....and small female wrists are almost certain to bruise...the bottom line is they hurt terribly...especially when they are applied tightly behind the back and you have to sit seatbelted in the back of a police cruiser..that is torture
And, on top of that she was shackled at the ankles..there is no excuse to treat a female like that...did they make her wear a chain attached to her waist also, so wonder she was in pain and could not move..it is not fair at all to a woman
2006-07-01 10:11:29 · 14 answers · asked by steveb17263 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
FEMALES DESERVE MORE RESPECT THAN THAT!!! No pain...
2006-07-01 10:27:09 · update #1
Wow ya'all manage to confuse me more and more every day.
I am going to assume Amber got what she deserved!
2006-07-01 10:16:28 · answer #1 · answered by foolnomore2games 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor Amber
2006-07-01 10:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by tictickchick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If this had been Europe, then this wouldn't happen unless she killed someone. But here in the US, it's the police's duty to secure a prisoner for transport, and an unruly prisoner needs to be more secured. It seems that the circumstances warrented the level of "treatment", regardless of gender.
2006-07-02 13:59:03 · answer #3 · answered by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amber? Amber? Who the F is Amber!?
As to what you said: "there is no excuse to treat a female like that..." How would you treat a female who had, for instance, chopped your pecker off? Or maliciously killed your child?? With a smile and a thank you?
2006-07-01 10:20:29 · answer #4 · answered by googlywotsit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She was driving drunk, under the influence, she was probably being incoherent. How can we trust what she is saying... I don't feel too sorry for her... she could have killed someone. She seemed more worried about how she was embarrassed in front of her friends than she was about the lives she put at risk by driving drunk.
So what if she is female... does that mean if she killed someone, the law should be easier on her, just because of her gender?
2006-07-01 10:18:00 · answer #5 · answered by Leigh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know who Amber is but I do know a few small girls that can take down the bigest man. So maybe they had to??!
Actually unless you were there.......ya just don't know.
One thing for sure is...............
There are 3 sides to every story...
yours, mine and, the cold hard truth!
2006-07-01 10:19:42 · answer #6 · answered by suequek 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ohhhhhhhh poor baby. How many version of the law do you want. We already got a special version for blacks. Do you think we ought to cater to chick criminals , too?
2006-07-01 10:23:50 · answer #7 · answered by tex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yet suggestively, if he mentioned he "did no longer like boobs in any respect" would not you be much greater perplexed? Btw, i in my opinion like boobs that are no longer too huge or too small. on the edge word, are you particular your physique feels like a 12 year previous?
2016-11-01 01:34:55 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the charge was definately not a traffic violation..would that be a fair assumption
2006-07-01 10:18:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
what?
yay 2 points
2006-07-01 10:14:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋