most democrats are good for being president.
2006-07-01 09:49:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
democrats are for all the people and not just the rich. they care about everyone and do eventually admit their mistakes.
2006-07-01 09:53:39 · answer #1 · answered by ediesheila 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer a sane, reasonable, uncorrupted president, which could conceivably come from either (or neither) party. Despite the childish rhetoric being flung around on this site, there is too little difference between Democrats and Republicans to give either side an automatic advantage at governing. The factors that make a good president come from the person, not from the party.
2006-07-01 16:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by Fred 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd like to see one in office that actually cares about the American people instead of constantly verbally masturbating us.
Left wingers and members of the Right column both agree that each party only represents the large corporations that fund each party. Neither one listens to the people.
I was raised in Springfield Illinois and I've said for years.. "Will someone please try to top Lincoln?" So far we've just been given "speech readers" and "oilwhores" for presidents.
I'm particularly amused at the present selection... we've taken a draft dodger (Bush) over a real hero (McCain) or even Al Gore and John Kerry.
Gore, McCain and Kerry were all men who REALLY paid the price for freedom and all we did as a nation was try to discredit them , while the draft dodging rich kid was protected by hiding the cowardice of his past.
No wonder God has chosen to plague American with so many disasters... we've become a nation of a$$holes!~
2006-07-01 16:57:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this time does not matter Republican or Democrat we need a 100% true American to hold the Fort
2006-07-01 16:53:53 · answer #4 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, we all remember what a great job Carter did. Wait a minute, what did he do? Nothing except give away the Panama Canal.
Clinton was great if your main source of information is the tabloids and Entertainment Weekly.
What a stupid question.
2006-07-08 08:15:20 · answer #5 · answered by somebody else 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Need control of the House first.
Then, the Ethics Commitee. Would they then expose ALL of the "rampant" dirty dealing of this Congress? I doubt it because they're involved also.
Why else for Hastert (filthy) and Pelosi (?) immediately crying out together against searches on their turf?
They refuse to defend "our" protection against unlawful search.Throw the bums out!
2006-07-01 17:14:41 · answer #6 · answered by Ambers'Dad 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as they put the people before money. Hey, that does already sound like the opposite of most Neo-Moronic Conservatives.
2006-07-01 17:04:01 · answer #7 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most democratic politicians are socialists, not realists.
2006-07-01 16:52:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want another Bill Clinton who is only remembered for Monica Lewinsky!
Yuck!
2006-07-01 16:54:01 · answer #9 · answered by lollypoppanda2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How bout just a good one who doesn't peddle excuses
2006-07-01 16:54:50 · answer #10 · answered by jadeaaustin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋