superman returns?

Question

i want to watch the film put dnt kno if it worth goin to see, so if theirs someone thats sin it can tell me if its good or not

Answer 1

About the worst I can say about this film is that I wasn't completely, utterly blown away by it. It didn't totally skyrocket above my expectations. That said, it is definitely a worthy followup to Richard Donner's original, and a very good film in its own right.

The new cast did a good job of filling the shoes of their predecessors. I'll take a moment to discuss the most scrutinized casting choice: Brandon Routh, a few awkward moments aside, assumes the role much as Christopher Reeve did. Rather than attempt to be larger than life and behave like an icon, he prefers to play it with more humanity and personality. He never comes across as a "comic book" character. Reeve has owned the role for 28 years at this point; no other actor has been able to earn it up to this point. But Routh put in his dues and he deserves it. He is Superman now. Consider the torch passed.

Kate Bosworth plays Lois Lane much as you'd expect. She's tough as nails, a career woman, and is more than just a damsel in distress, but motherhood does add an interesting new dynamic to the character. James Mardsen is good as her live-in boyfriend/fiancée/whatever, and doesn't ever cover his eyes up. Oddly enough, the only original cast members I really found myself missing were Jackie Cooper (Perry White) and Marc McClure (Jimmy Olsen). Their roles are the only ones I felt weren't recast well. The new Perry White was flat and uninteresting, and the new Jimmy Olsen is the Jar Jar Binks of this film. Hopefully they iron out the wrinkles in their performances by the time the inevitable sequel comes around.

I was a little apprehensive when I read that Bryan Singer was going to be very faithful to Richard Donner's original vision, since it would be very easy for the project to descend into rehash. But rather than use Donner's film as a template to plug his own actors and lines into, Singer instead fashions his own film with a unique tone, albeit with frequent nods to the original. It's hardly a copy of the 1978 film, but it never misses an opportunity to throw in a few classic chestnuts for the fans. Also, look for Jack Larson and Noell Neil (Jimmy Olsen and Lois Lane from the '50s television series, respectively) in small roles. To further tie this film in with the original, John Williams' original music cues are arranged into the score for great effect, and the opening credits are a modernized version of the classic sequence.

The special effects in this film are incredible. There are some action scenes where Routh's performance is mixed with a CGI Superman, but the animation is impeccable enough that it's occasionally genuinely difficult to distinguish between the two. And this isn't Spider-Man. The artists didn't have the luxury of a hero who wears a full body suit and a full-face mask. They had to convincingly recreate Routh's face, hair, and expressions, and they do an admirable job. This is the absolute peak of Hollywood's current computer imagery capabilities.

I won't say much about the plot. Luthor's scheme echoes the original Superman film: destroy old land (and the people on it), build new land over it. But that's where the similarities end. This time around, the real estate aspects of the evil plan are almost inconsequential. The focus is placed squarely on Luthor's revenge against Superman, and Kevin Spacey plays the part very well. He plays it a little less silly and a lot more dark and vicious than Gene Hackman did, but there are still a few moments of humor when the villains are around. The casting choice of Parker Posey as Luthor's female sidekick has gotten some attention, but it's not a big deal. Her character is basically a stand-in for the role Valerie Perrine originally played.

Much of the plot is Superman and Lois coming to terms with lost love, but it isn't as nauseating as certain journalists seem to be playing it off as. Early reports of the film being a "chick flick" are exaggerated to the point of idiocy. (Of course, Singer deserves some of the blame for this, since he originally made the "chick flick" remark in jest during an interview.) And, as anybody who has read the press summary of the film knows, Lois Lane has a child, whose parentage may be more than it seems.

All in all, I'm not sure I'd say it beats Donner's film. But it certainly beats any other screen version of Superman to date. I can't wait to see it in IMAX with the 3D scenes.

Answer 2

this is the baby. Superman has intercourse with Lois in 2. you need to drop the different action pictures for Superman Returns to make experience. She has to have been pregnant whilst Superman is going to Krypton for the schedule interior the hot action picture to artwork. of direction the relationship is week. Luther is going to detention center in one. the final is going to area detention center in 2. And in a Superman tries to end nuclear proliferation and lands up diserting the international and having to exhibit regret for his absence, If he did circulate off to Krypton there must be a narrative there. the subject is on the top of two, clark kisses Lois and wipes her memory of te intercourse, so; how could she react whilst she is without warning pregnant and can't remember who the father is? enter her article in this action picture and you will possibly think of she figured a number of it out for herself.

Answer 3

It had so much hype because superman is a classic name.

Wait for video. its kind of a buzz kill. They dont even show the american flag once in the movie. This film says his returnt o earth is purley revenge. it isnt driven by God and country or saving the day. its REVENGE.

i dont like how they changed the whole backbone behind superman.

Answer 4

It wasn't bad, however I could have predicted the whole thing. But it's worth seeing if you like those hero/love stories.

Answer 5

it's good not a classic but good worth the money

Answer 6

If I had been paying a lot of attention I'm sure it would've sucked.

Answer 7

IT WAS REALLY GOOD!!!! I LOVED IT!!!! it's worth your money to go see! well in my opinion, other people may see it differently, but to me! it was awesome! i didnt want it to end!lol! :-)

Answer 8

Not

Answer 9

dont know,sorry

Answer 10

no, sucks.