No way are they!
They are too lenient and need to start handing the yellow card out
Most of them are biased and can easily be persuaded by SLIMY, GAY people like Cristiano Ronaldo. He deserves to be punished for that (hopefully be Rooney =D)
Others aren't easily influenced and do do a gd job. Well done to those HONEST UNBIASED REFS!
We aren't all drunks thanks! At least we have good players that don't perform oscar winning dives and cheat their way to winning. And at least us fans show loyalty to our team, even in rough patch's
WE STILL LOVE YOU ENGLAND!
2006-07-01 07:33:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, NO, NO.
The words referee, worldcup 2006, and FAIR shud NEVER go in one sentence in a positive way. Did you see Croatia vs Asutralia? Come on. Its simple math. 1 yellow plus 1 yellow = 1 red! you dont need THREE yellows to be out. gosh. and the penalty vs australia wasnt too necessary. there were loads of fouls that werent called. so please.
See or no See. Sometimes i guess u cant be everywhere. U cant see everything. But you can also overdo it with "not seeing".
2006-07-01 07:33:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell No!!!!!!!!!!!! When they haven't been busy throwing cards at everybody, they have been afraid of calling anything because they didn't want to be criticized. Lok at the Holland v. Portugal game. 16 yellows, 4 reds. The next day, Ukraine v. Switzerland, 1 yellow and under fifteen total fouls. The refs need to be more definitive on what is a foul.
2006-07-01 07:34:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kenny 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Couple issues 1st. Mexico is extra corrupt incredibly even as their personal president bought the votes to win the election 2d. Why mexico? i imagine that is extra efficient in any usa that hasnt hosted it two times alredy third. Brazil unfavourable? I dont imagine so in the different case they wouldnt have gained the bid for 2014 4th. What makes you imagine mexico will win wc at domicile in the experience that they cant even beat jamaica at domicile in the time of a qualifier? And very last. even as did mexico win of a rest room (apart from children communities) im incredibly certain that could be not in any respect. No offense in straight forward words cuz you thumb me down doesnt propose im incorrect its all real
2016-11-30 02:38:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by mitch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your team won, then they were fair. If your team lost, then they were not. I'm discovering that this is the fundamental rule of being a soccer fan. Your team is always the best, so they will always win....UNLESS the refs screwed your team. That's the only way soccer is lost!
2006-07-01 07:34:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by wildraft1 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way at all. They gave the US a red card when it wasnt even needed. Sometimes they become super harsh, other times they ignore stuff.
There is a need for instant replays to make refs decide stuff fairly.
2006-07-01 07:33:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by swerveut 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes for far to long now there has been a culture of diving and fake injuries and the refs have to get on top off it also they now have to stop running up to the ref and goading him so they will be unpopular for a while but that will pass and players will play and not act
2006-07-01 07:34:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by n1mngr 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
A BIG NO. Argentina was cheated and England should not have gotten a red card.....But i am glad the ref's cheated to help England lose. Bye Bye England you drunks.
2006-07-01 07:33:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by tony c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Overall yes, a bit picky but fair.
2006-07-01 07:31:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Tammy S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
all the refs SUCK. FIFA should burn them after the finale
2006-07-01 07:33:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋