2006-07-01 07:04:26 · 11 answers · asked by luisao 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Played better with 10 men....than 11....Erikssons tactics throughout the world cup have been a joke...Portugal..couldn't break a team of 10 men down....England were the better side from the 62nd minute.........
2006-07-01 07:45:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Villa did no longer have a clue quicker they eliminate their manager the extra efficient. Bradford properly deserved their win. an outstanding vacation for the followers to go back at Wembley yet i imagine which will be one interest too a options. Pity.
2016-11-30 02:36:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they weren't great but portugal should have scored easily as soon as we were down to 10 men after the incident with Rooney
We weren't at out best but we were still the better team.
2006-07-01 07:10:07 · answer #3 · answered by ATP 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me cause they played great with 10 men
2006-07-01 07:14:47 · answer #4 · answered by qwertyu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
me!! i think both teams played well... but isnt it about time england got further in the world cup for once?
2006-07-01 07:09:29 · answer #5 · answered by sarah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Couldn't score and were crap at penalty kicks.The right team is going home today.
2006-07-01 07:10:55 · answer #6 · answered by David S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we were a load of *****'s cant win a bloody thing england
2006-07-01 07:12:38 · answer #7 · answered by kmbl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shut up!
England were sh!t!
2006-07-01 07:44:08 · answer #8 · answered by tricia1971 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nobody,they were terrible
2006-07-01 07:07:54 · answer #9 · answered by b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
me :D
2006-07-01 07:10:46 · answer #10 · answered by kanga 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋