Is it really worth the cost or just a passing fad?
2006-07-01 06:12:48 · 9 answers · asked by Bubba 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I have both so cant tell you which one to get because they both have advantages and disadvantages. Both are great the programing is great on both tho they both have shows that can only be found on one another. It is well worth the cost. To me
2006-07-01 06:19:44 · answer #1 · answered by tc_an_american 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both have grown up a lot and XM has more subscribers. I actually like the XM portable receiver with an mp3 player built in. Its not much bigger than an ipod.
2006-07-01 13:16:32 · answer #2 · answered by microsvc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
XM... it has more subscribers and is more likely to be the one that last
2006-07-01 16:15:32 · answer #3 · answered by gearjammer63670 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get an ipod instead. Mine holds 15,000 songs, so I figure it's just like serious radio, accept I know that I will love every single song on it.
2006-07-01 13:20:43 · answer #4 · answered by joyfulnoise83 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I had Sirius first. It was OK, But...
XM is much much better.
2006-07-01 13:24:56 · answer #5 · answered by thearthound 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
XM can go anywhere, you can even get a boombox and play it in your garage!
2006-07-01 13:17:08 · answer #6 · answered by Kaitlin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
xm because it is portable not sirus that is on the car pick me as a bestanswer
2006-07-01 13:16:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
xm radio is awsome!
2006-07-01 13:16:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
both
2006-07-01 13:15:27 · answer #9 · answered by jyd9999 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋