2006-07-01 02:50:58 · 63 answers · asked by ciyire 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
people are going to say hitler, because of the holocaust.
and that is the only reason.
dont get me wrong.
Hitler was one sick ****, and the Holocaust was easily one of the greatest atrocities ever commited.
they are both bad in their own reason.
actually, other than the rise of the nazi power, hitler wasnt all that bad of a guy. he improved Germany so mcuh from World War 1. He created tons of new jobs, and stimulated the economy.
bush, however, is killing innocent civilians, AND ruining our country.
2006-07-01 02:54:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dahlia Jihad 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
That's an assinine question to ask. You can't compare the two at all, because both are completely different.
Hitler was a leader of an evil empire that wanted to exterminate the Jewish people, and take over most if not all of the world. He brought much shame to Germany during that time which they have since come back from to be a great nation once again.
President Bush is an elected leader by the people of The United States. He doesn't just decide things and they happen. It depends on different levels of Goverment. President Bush is a war president because war was declared on our nation the moment the first plane hit the world trade center on September 11th 2001. This war on terror was already starting to evolve over the years for the last twenty years or so. Bush had the guts to say it's time to take the fight to our enemies, remove brutal dictators so others in the world can be free, and help build nations on the ideals of democracy.
2006-07-01 03:19:18 · answer #2 · answered by aurastin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am no fan of Bush, but for cryin' out loud, Hitler slaughtered over 11 million undesirables. That does not include those killed battle. The Nazis used these undesirables for experiments more gruesome than you can possibly imagine. Prison guards used them for target practice. Bush has done nothing that even compares to that. By asking such a question, you are maybe two or three steps short of Holocaust denial.
Edit: I am disgusted at some of the answers here.
"Bush he worst for that he is hypocrite and liar" --slahalslah. Are you suggesting that being a hypoctire and liar is worse than slaughtering 11 million people?
"if i have to decide i'd say bush because i have to live with it." --mandy. So because Bush is around now and Hitler killed himself 61 years ago, that excuses Hitler's crimes?
"Clearly George Bush." --yadirajosie. Why? Because you happen to like a different candidate?
"George Bush of course!" --lipglossgrl25. How many innocent people did Bush kill (or order killed)?
"Bush and his puppet masters have truly ruined the world.Hitler only dreamed of ruining the world." --Captain Feathersword. So if Hitler killed *all* of the Jews and gays and Catholics, Bush would still be worse because he invaded Iraq?
"Bush" --RyJa. See above.
"Bush is worse. COmpared to hitler , hitler was a nice man." --Dongivaphk. Why don't you just come forth and say the Holocaust never happened?
"Holocaust=load of BULLSHIT" --reichman2007. I suggest for you a one-way trip to Auschwicz. Please don't breed.
2006-07-01 03:51:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly I have no idea how you come up w/ some of these queations. Adolf Hitler killed millions upon million sof people basically b/c he didn't want them around anymore. How many people have died while Bush has been in office?? Not even close to those killed under Hitler. George Bush is a very godly man who just makes some mistakes everyocnce in a while big deal we all do that so we should cut him some slack. If want to talk it over some more then just contact me.
2006-07-01 03:04:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adolf Hitler is by far the worse of the two. When did George Bush build concentration camps or commit genocide? Did George Bush ever kill 60,000,000 people?
2006-07-02 11:01:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adolf Hitler certainly is the worse. Bush is the leader of democratic United States of America.
2006-07-01 02:55:12 · answer #6 · answered by pyj 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clearly George Bush
2006-07-01 02:52:05 · answer #7 · answered by yadirajosie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush, because you knew Adolf Hitler's motives. We're still trying to figure George's out.
2006-07-01 02:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
anyone who answers George Bush is either too young to really understand what Hitler did or is just plain moronic.
Yes Bush is in Iraq and in many peoples eyes he should not be there.But Bush has removed a vicious dictator from power and is trying to help Iraq get back on its feet.
Hitler on the other hand rounded up anyone who was Jewish Gypsies Black basically anyone who didnt fit his idea of the master race.That would include a great number of people living in the USA right now.He toutered he killed he split up families of people whos only wrongdoing was being diffrent than him.Perhaps anyone who answers Bush should do some research into the sick and twisted doings of the Nazi regime.Maybe visit AUSHWITZ(sp?) for youself then tell me that Bush is worse that that pathetic ignorant moronic peice of SH*T that was Adolf Hitler.
Really people you need to wake up.
My answer is Hitler was worse.
2006-07-01 03:05:29 · answer #9 · answered by butchdalton 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Comparing Bush to Hitler can only make Bush look better. Hitler was obviously bad, everyone knows that, and nobody else in recent history has come particularly close, even Bush. All you're doing is looking stupid to the thinking public.
2006-07-01 03:23:08 · answer #10 · answered by Fenris 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush. Adolf Hitler never hid who he was
2006-07-01 02:54:16 · answer #11 · answered by butterflykisses427 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋