English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The statement was originally made byHarvard Geneticist Richard Lewontin

2006-07-01 01:44:30 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Other - Science

If this statement is true than the statement itself must be testable by the scientific process.

2006-07-01 02:11:37 · update #1

finnkrypton
Are you saying that this is a statement of faith rather than truth?

2006-07-01 02:28:38 · update #2

yarnlady_nee...
I know all of this. I am asking how to test a specific Hypothesis which is stated above. How could such a study or experiment be set up and tested?

2006-07-02 02:33:15 · update #3

3 answers

It is not a scientifically testable statement. Basically, you need to define your terms before you can even start. To have any validity, this statement would need qualifiers. You would need to have agreement about the processes involved. This statement has more to do with philosophy rather than science. Rational people can agree on combining hydrogen and oxygen to form water; they cannot agree on the meaning of "truth".

2006-07-01 02:25:00 · answer #1 · answered by finnkrypton 2 · 5 3

"Experimental proof is what makes all of the observations and answers in science valid (proved). The proof shows that the statements are correct and accurate. It sounds like a simple idea, but it is the basis of all science. Statements must be proved. Enough said.
Scientists start with observations and then make a hypothesis (a guess), and then the fun begins. They must then prove their hypothesis with trials and tests that show why their data and results are correct. They must use controls, which are quantitative (based on values and figures, not emotions). Science needs both ideas (the hypothesis) and facts (the quantitative results) to move forward. Scientists can then examine their data and develop newer ideas. This process will lead to more observation and refinement of hypotheses."

2006-07-01 22:03:43 · answer #2 · answered by Yarnlady_needsyarn 7 · 0 0

properly as a Conservative with a level in Environmental Sciences all i will tell is that 'technology" gets it incorrect lots of the time. a million. the wonderful scientific minds of their time as quickly as denied the life of the Mountain Gorilla. 2. the wonderful scientific minds of their time felt guy might by no ability fly or commute to the moon 3. the wonderful scientific minds of their time informed us the Coelacanth has been extinct for six million years 4. the wonderful scientific minds of their time informed us guy might desire to not proceed to exist traveling at speeds of fifty MPH or better 5. a number of the brightest scientific minds of their time warned of the appearance Ice Age back interior the 70's Now i like technology and consistently have (considering i became a small baby) yet as a count of fact technology fairly generally get this is incorrect formerly it ultimately gets it actual.

2016-12-08 14:35:58 · answer #3 · answered by stiver 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers