2006-06-30 18:15:35 · 18 answers · asked by tally m 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I think he would fully be in favor of Adult stem cell research and stems cells that are harvested from the placenta after birth has occured. These are very viable options and the science is growing very fast
2006-06-30 18:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by johnnashiscrazy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know what Jesus would do - but I think funding research for no reason is foolish.
I know I would fund stem cell research. Adult stem cell research that is.
Embryonic stem cell research has produced nothing and adult stem cell research has consistently delivered cures. So why are we still throwing funding at research that is a waste of time instead of funding research that has proven itself time and time again?
2006-07-01 01:22:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Jesus would not favor stem-cell research or fund it. He was (is) a healer, for starters. He would heal the afflicted. He is also a "laying-on-of-hands" healer, so He would not (most likely) support modern medicine.
Peace.
2006-07-01 01:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by cosmosclara 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus already knows about stem cells. He don't need to research them.
2006-07-01 01:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by Poncho Rio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this is one of those stupid questions where people give THEIR opinions instead of what the person would do in this case jesus WE as HUMAN'S can only GUESS what he would have thought if anyone answers with a yes or no you are total idiots.... people say oh no he wouldn't becuz they don't like the idea same with the da vinci code they don't want to believe he married a prostitute and had a kid but it might have happened or mabey not who knows cuz i don't and i don't think any1 else does
2006-07-01 01:20:32 · answer #5 · answered by Landon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus es de Mexico y no entiende tu pregunta. Preguntale en Español por favor.
2006-07-01 01:20:10 · answer #6 · answered by Private Account 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he would fund if the stem cells were taken from our own body and transplanted. Which really works. Don't kill babies to get it thats murder.
2006-07-01 01:20:49 · answer #7 · answered by rapturefuture 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not from humans, but perhaps animals for veterinary purposes. Sacrificing one person to save another is wrong. To be logical, I would also be against euthanizing a sick person to somehow save a pregnancy.
2006-07-01 01:24:26 · answer #8 · answered by Singlemomof10 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would top Warren Buffets $31 Billion and then go away.
2006-07-01 01:25:12 · answer #9 · answered by tec97215 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wouldn't fund research of things He already knows about. He would heal those who had faith to be healed. He wants to heal all, but he can't have faith for you.
2006-07-01 01:18:58 · answer #10 · answered by mickjam 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋