English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If normal good people knew about cell phone guns, do you think they would have been so hard on the Palm Beach Officer who Tasered the women in the SUV while she was holding a cell phone?
Here is a link that shows one kind of cell phone gun. There are a variety of different kinds I have actually found one on a known Gang Member. It was different than the link and only held one round, this one holds four. We did not test fire it to see if it really worked, but it sure looked like it could. http://cellular.co.za/phones/gunphone/gun-phone.htm
Cops never know who is friend or foe or what could be a weapon.

2006-06-30 18:10:30 · 9 answers · asked by jawsh3539 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

9 answers

i did not hear about this incident but cell phone guns have been around for years and if he only tasered her that was good for the officer out here she would have been shot the officers dont have tasers. the officer was totaly in the right, there are too many people that think they can act crazy with the cops and not do what they are told and get away with it. the taser is a great way to gain control of a subject and not kill them more departments should have then and we need to stand behind every officer that uses the tasers some one insted of killing them.

2006-06-30 18:21:07 · answer #1 · answered by Coconuts 5 · 3 0

2

2016-08-12 06:34:15 · answer #2 · answered by Silvia 3 · 0 0

It doesn't change my opinion...the officer standing there should be able to do what he/she thinks is right at the time. If that means a taser and there's reason to believe it's needed then better that than a funeral. There's been times I've had to reach across the vehicle to get a DL or something and I always wait until the officer is standing there and say what I'm doing - because from the other side of the door you DON'T know who's friend or foe. I know too many in that position but most cases the guy standing at a checkpoint doesn't know that.
IMO you do what you have to in order to go home at the end of the night. If that isn't enough for some - at least you get to go home. That's worth a bunch. ;-)

2006-06-30 18:29:38 · answer #3 · answered by Jan H 5 · 0 0

Mainstream media will be loaded with #$#@! even as it contains international warming, ascertain you get literate on the concern from elements that really comprehend what they are speaking about. The mainstream media will be particularly biased one way or the different. the very reality of it really is that there is quite convincing info to each and every aspect of the argument. initially, you've the very incontrovertible reality that the elements has been replacing by utilizing organic events because the formation of the planet. there have been warmth classes like the only we are in now, and chilly classes (in many circumstances observed as Ice a lengthy time period), and the IPCC has many photos with regards to that. yet interior an same breath, there is an increasing quantity of greenhouse gases contained in the ambience, and they'd nicely be contributing a large quantity to creating the planet hotter. With all this in ideas there is very much of issues nonetheless to be realized about our own ecosystem. contained in the second one picture i have appropriate you to right here, be conscious that there are very much of blunders with distinct the estimates in how a lot radiative forcing led to by utilizing that diverse result. This symbolizes how a lot we do not comprehend nonetheless about the Earth's ecosystem. The oblique of aerosols would nicely be thoroughly counterbalancing each and every of the radiative forcing of greenhouse gases. (A be conscious on the graph, an excellent bar signifies that it makes the Earth hotter, a unfavorable bar makes the Earth cooler) So in reality, there is not any man or woman who has a sturdy answer, and the in person-friendly words actual thanks to have an opinion is to ascertain you examine up on the concern, and save music of each and every of the alterations that run by the concern, from a strong, independent source of concepts. In different words, ward off the mainstream media and don't be afraid to do somewhat study. no longer less than ascertain you do not sound like you swallowed the television. To that result i have extra yet another strong source of information to the resources that myself and different meteorology major i comprehend flow for concepts. those are distinct the superb places to commence.

2016-10-14 00:42:02 · answer #4 · answered by basinger 4 · 0 0

It didn't change my opinion because.... I hadn't formed an opinion because I had not heard of this incident. Yeah, some people think cops are gun crazy. It can actual be lifethreatening work.

2006-06-30 18:14:17 · answer #5 · answered by lend322 4 · 0 0

she shouldnt have been tasered unless he asked her to put down the cell phone and she refused and then got out of hand

2006-06-30 18:24:31 · answer #6 · answered by tabbyjo27 3 · 0 0

Using a taser is better than shooting someone. The shock is bad but they will recover. If someone is doing something illegal, I have no sympathy for them.

2006-06-30 18:15:34 · answer #7 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0 0

a person who is not obeying the lawful orders of the police are subject to being physcially detained

2006-07-01 02:06:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Thanks for the heads up. I hadn't seen that one. WTF will they come up with next. Stay safe.

2006-06-30 18:22:33 · answer #9 · answered by Microsoft Bob 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers