2006-06-30 16:43:40 · 16 answers · asked by god's child 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I wouldn't say it's inevitable... perhaps just very likely.
2006-06-30 16:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by racer717 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Let's pray we don't. North Koreans know how to fight and both Iran and North Korea are terrain that limits the mobility that we would otherwise enjoy in a military conflict. And of course, the Korean war never ended. We only have a truce even today.
2006-07-01 00:05:10 · answer #2 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't think so. I think the REAL, primary reason we are in Iraq is to create a free and prosperous, secular government in a mostly Shiite country (like Iran...no coincidence) right next door to Iran. The goal is to de-stabilize Iran. Think of Iran surrounded by 2 free, western friendly governments (Iraq, Afghanistan). North Korea will not actually instigate U.S. action. The Chinese won't allow it, and they need the Chinese to survive. Iran and North Korea will fall without force, just watch and remember my words. It will take a few years though.
2006-06-30 23:53:11 · answer #3 · answered by alieneddiexxx 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is how the Republicans make their blood money. What is the purpose of the UN to intervene in this such matters. Just becuse they don't have the policy of the american government is throwing a temper tantrum we better attack in unison to avoid trouble. Who cares if Iran and and North Korea has nukes hell why don't they save themselves all the trouble and buy them from russia everyone else has. Americans need to stay out of other countries affairs. What's next Cuba has WMD hidden is cigars and rum lets attack them and take over.
2006-07-01 00:47:54 · answer #4 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its probably inevitable, The leader of North korea is kinda a crazy guy and he won't stop threatening us until we act. We will be involved militarily as soon as it is best and sagest for our country
2006-06-30 23:59:58 · answer #5 · answered by THEBurgerKing 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not Inevitavly...probably, plausibly...depends on how soon the US does (or does not) finish fixing its messes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran can be avoided...a few more years of miserable shar'ia law upon its citizens will see to that. North Korea on the other hand will depend on how long before Kim Jong Ill cannot feed his generals and whores and they decide to revolt.
2006-07-01 00:13:11 · answer #6 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say inevitable. In my opinion, with our current president, it's more than likely. But I find it hard that our congress will let that pass, especially with his current ratings and the prospect of a newly-democratic congress come November. What everyone is terrified about is another Iraq.
So in the end... inevitable, no. Possible, yes.
2006-06-30 23:50:05 · answer #7 · answered by Lex 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope, every year the crazy leaders of Iran and north Korea get older and closer to death, just wait them out like we are doing with Cuba.
Iran even has a large possibility of an overthrow of government, might happen in the next few years.
2006-06-30 23:48:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A possibility, but not inevitable.
I think we should take away Kim Jong Il's platform shoes, shave his head, strip him naked (dip him in cold water) and leave him in the public square so his people can see the real "Dear Leader" (aka, a real A-1 Egotistical ******)
2006-06-30 23:57:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends who you vote for in November.
2006-07-01 00:12:49 · answer #10 · answered by normobrian 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋