Extremist (and many non-extremist) lefties support Abortion, and extremist righty tighties (like Hitler, Hussein, etc.) support genocide.
Which is worse for humanity?
I'm proposing that if we had to pick ONE, whcih should we pick?
2006-06-30 11:53:23 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Which one is worse for humanity???? That's simple. Which one kills living human beings instead of potential to be a living human being?
2006-07-01 12:36:34 · answer #1 · answered by American Spirit 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The two are incomparable... it is hyperbole.
But to answer your question, genocide is much worse. I feel that there is nothing wrong with abortion, and that it can even be the best choice sometimes. Genocide, however, is always wrong because it is illogical and driven by hatred. It also kills a lot more people, and those that are killed have already established a life.
So pick abortion.
2006-06-30 19:03:30 · answer #2 · answered by Rat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Abortion IS genocide. See:
http://www.blackgenocide.org/abortion.html
2006-07-01 08:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a loaded question that is!
I'll play devil's advocate for a moment, assuming one disagrees with both:
Since abortion can be done in relative privacy, there are little external influences that can be exerted upon it.
Genocide, however, is a very public occurance, and affords the opportunity for outside intervention.
I don't believe in either, personally, but I would say genocide is worse, but easier to stop if the desire is truly there.
2006-06-30 19:00:08 · answer #4 · answered by K M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if we had to go by what the bible said, genocide is a good thing. Abortion isn't mentioned, really, so it's hard to say.
Both are bad.
I think... and this is my opinion, that genocide is worse. Killing entire groups of people
Aborting a fetus stops the child from being born into an unwanted atmosphere, keeps a child from being unloved, abused, neglected, and keeps children from having to deal with the mental problems that arise from those situations.
2006-06-30 19:08:36 · answer #5 · answered by Dustin Lochart 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your kidding right??? Both invloves killing another human for really no reason at all except that you don't want them. Yes i understand that sometimes is needed to save the mothers life but that's all it should be used for. Period end of story. Genocide is just as bad so know that i am in no way condoning it. So really i see no point in your question. I do apologize if that's not the answer you rlooking for. Contact me if you want to discuss thsi furher.
2006-06-30 19:15:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Those are only two people. Most conervative people don't support genocide, that is a stereotyype. And I think that Hitler and hussein were in a different category actually, Communisn and dictatorship.
2006-06-30 18:57:47 · answer #7 · answered by anonymous 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Genocideis the worse. It affects countless people. There is nothing positive about it.
Abortion is an individual matter. Good can come from it.
In any case, they are not comparable. Apples and oranges.
2006-06-30 19:00:03 · answer #8 · answered by Elvendra 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Genocide is the worst crime.
Abortion could be a necessity for certain woman, I mean a question of survival if they have certain health problems.
2006-06-30 19:02:56 · answer #9 · answered by nadira456 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
genocide
There are situations where abortions are necessary to save the mothers life,
what could possibly be the positive side of genocide?
2006-06-30 18:57:30 · answer #10 · answered by mand 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋