No weapons of mass distruction found in Iraq, Iran is using nuclear enegry for domestic use and that's a problem,. North korea is testing nuclear missiles, capable to reach US and thats ok?
2006-06-30 10:06:11 · 12 answers · asked by emilio z 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
North Korea doesnt have any oil.
2006-06-30 10:09:24 · answer #1 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Am I the only one who's going to point out that Bubbly's in the wrong conversation? Japan? WTF, mate?
I can't take the N. Korean dude seriously since watching Team America. I know that's a really stupid thing to say, but I can't help it! Maybe Bush saw the movie too.
The whole thing with Iraq is sticky. It's GREAT that Saddam is out. He's an evil guy who killed innocent people. That doesn't mean the ends justify the means, but again, he's out. Now that we've made a royal mess of the place, we can't just leave the Iraqi people high and dry. WE brought democracy over there, so WE should help maintain it. It's still an unstable country, and it's our fault. We did the same thing in Japan after WW2, right?
What purpose would N. Korea have if they DID send nukes our way? The other dominant countries of the world WON'T take NK's side. NK would be mass chaos if it were to do something like that. In that respect, it's not a threat (don't get me wrong, it is).
In Iraq force had to be used because reasoning just wasn't cutting it. NK wants to be a powerforce in the world, so NK has to ACT like one and negotiate if it wants to sit at the lunch table with the rest of the cool countries. They're different countries with different situations, and therefore they need to be handled differently.
If you honestly think Bush's administration isn't fully aware of the situation in NK (YOU are, so obviously they're going to be at least a step ahead of you, whoever you are), you're just plain ig'nant.
2006-07-01 11:19:22 · answer #2 · answered by elizabeth_ashley44 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One the US president is an idiot (his hidden agenda overrode the obvious truth that Iraq is nothing NoKor is the threat). Two North Korea's missiles can be shot down by the new missile defence system (assuming it hasnt been cancelled like certain other projects). Three the little slitty korean puke isnt ready to die for his little fiefdom (and in reverse no North Korean which hasnt been brainwashed is willing to die for the mo'fo). Four the US has to help the Iraqis get on their feet or else the world will have another Iran or worse. Five the US president is still an idiot even after years of failed opportunities to fix the whole issue.
2006-06-30 18:09:07 · answer #3 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Clinton had done HIS job, North Korea wouldn't have had nukes in the first place. But he did nothing, and his Sec of State, Albright even went there and danced, DANCED!!!, with the little troll himself. And jumpin' jackass Carter even joined in. And they allowed Li'l Kimmy to build nukes.
It was a done deal by the time Bush was sworn into the office, and the South Koreans were already getting wishy-washy. He's been working with all the players in that area of the world in conferences and diplomatic negotiation. But why all the concern now for N. Korea? Why no concern when Clinton blinked and failed to prevent a nuclearized N. Korea?
As for the bizarre statement that iran is pursuing nukes for domestic energy, that's laughable. Then why are their sites spread out and underground? Why do they need nuclear energy when they're sitting on more oil than they can sell and use in 200 years? They are not looking for energy, they want to build bombs. You need to respect the threat, not go tootling around in some fantasyland.
2006-06-30 10:35:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because what we are doing in Iraq is going to change the world. Besides, we can shoot down N. Korea's missiles.
BTW - maybe you should explain to those soldiers injured by the nerve-gas shell rigged as an IED a couple of years ago how there were no 'WMD' in Iraq. It would be amusing listening to you try to tell them that it was no nerve gas.
2006-06-30 12:52:48 · answer #5 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cuz Iran is at leats 10 years away from from nukes and we can shoot down any missiles fired from N.Korea
2006-06-30 12:55:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely i imagine its a teach of ability to warn both Israel and the U. S. that if attacked its missiles would rain down on Israel in retaliation.. Its a risky technique besides the undeniable fact that because if Israel feels threatened its extra in all probability to launch a preemptive strike on Iran which could neutralise the missiles
2016-10-14 00:18:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cuz Iraq is what we've started and we need to finish it!! and no country in their right mind would deploy those bombs!
Japan knows that they don't have a chance of winning a war against us!!
2006-06-30 12:52:57 · answer #8 · answered by Danielle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because its easier to attack muslims. they live in stone and wood houses that are far easier to blow up from 10,000 feet in the air. plus yeah...N korea doesent have oil.
the only reaso nwere in iraq is because of the oil. you can take that freedom for iraquis, war on terrorism or anything like that and throw it out the window. its painfully obvious.
2006-06-30 10:11:04 · answer #9 · answered by johnny_zondo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because north korea dont want it with us, they just want respect to say "hey look at us we have nukes" they dont want war, they want money, search satilaite pics of north korea, there is nothin there but bushes and trees, someone said it war makes money and thats want they want,
2006-06-30 10:13:34 · answer #10 · answered by da_boo_34 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋