The Bible was written thousands of years ago right. People beleive in Jesus today as being a God-Like being, if not God himself. By that rationale do you think in 10 thousand years Peter Pan will be worshipped as a God? It seems logical.
2006-06-30 02:25:26 · 19 answers · asked by Videodrome 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Of course, you are being sarcastic, but your underlying point is whether Christianity will be viewed in the distant future the same as Greek, Roman and Egyptian mythology. It's a good question. As humans continue to make social, economic, and technological advances, will people still hold true to their current religious beliefs.
Will today's religions be replaced by newer more popular religions which have the effect of relegating older ones to mythology? It is certainly possible.
2006-06-30 02:37:22 · answer #1 · answered by Darth Plagueis 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It only seems logical if you have no idea what you are talking about and are being intentionally antagonistic. The Bible was written as a religious text. It is about God. Peter Pan is neither of those things.
2006-06-30 02:28:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
On the surface, it may sound OK but tell us-- Have you ever seen Peter Pan's action figures crying? Jesus figures are at times reported to do so. Have you ever heard about visions in which Peter Pan comes to people and preaches them? Jesus is reported to come. I guess we could find more similar examples.
I don't think Peter Pan will be worshipped in such a way.
2006-06-30 02:33:21 · answer #3 · answered by peteyparko 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, in 10,000 years. after the human race is extinct, the alien archaeologists will arrive and determine that we were a pantheistic society, with our two main gods as "Coke" and "Pepsi". They will find their temples everywhere, with lots of shiny offerings we left for them in exchange for their blessings. Other gods will be Nike, Hilfiger, and the like.
As a secondary thought, compared to Greek, Roman, Norse, and Egyptian Mythology and the length of time people believed in those, Christianity is still a fledgling religion. I have, as an outside observer, noticed it's slow decline over the last several years. So, we're going to have to come up with some mythical figurehead to worship, and Peter Pan sounds just as good as any.
2006-06-30 02:31:34 · answer #4 · answered by robotripper989 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No! Jesus is the Son of God. Peter Pan is a fictional character. How could you even compare the two?
2006-06-30 02:28:47 · answer #5 · answered by Amelia E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
But it is not logical because there are many outside documents that supported Jesus' existence. Josephus Flavius was a Roman historian who wrote of Jesus. Just do your homework and see for yourself.
Read Chicago Tribune's research on this topic. Lee Strobel wrote the book "The Case for Christ" and the other book "The Case for the Creator".
2006-06-30 02:31:10 · answer #6 · answered by ddead_alive 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Jesus is logical, historical and reasonable. Peter Pan is none of the above.
2006-06-30 02:31:17 · answer #7 · answered by mrearly2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When they find that 1st page of the bible that says....
This book is ficticious, all characters and events
are made up. Any ref to anyone either live or dead is
trully co-incidental...
I think people will worship hedgehogs!!! lmfao...
2006-06-30 02:30:15 · answer #8 · answered by Banderes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is logical. king Arthur and the knights of the round table was only a story but now many idiots think it was true. so it is possible that some fictional; stories of our time will be misread as true by the hard of thinking
2006-06-30 02:31:48 · answer #9 · answered by onapizzadiet 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is historical fact that Jesus did live. (search it) where it becomes an issue is if you believe his claim to be the Son Of God.
To say he is a myth is mentally lazy when that historical fact prove he did live.
http://www.sonic.net/sentinel/naij3.html
this is not a christian site but a historical account.
2006-06-30 02:40:15 · answer #10 · answered by Dead Man Walking 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋