Do you think DUI laws are destructive?

Question

If you had no accident and where arrested and convicted, do you think you got more than you deserved for a punishment? They take your money, your work, your freedom, and the ability to get those things back for a long time.

To the self rightious militants out there...remember that when you talk on the phone while driving....you're as good as drunk in my eyes!

Answer 1

I was driving home from work late one night and a man was walking down the middle of the left hand land. If I had hit him it would have been considered an accident. If I had one beer, it would have been manslaughter. Another time, young bicyclists ran a red light as I was approaching to make a left hand turn, I had to slam on my brakes to avoid hitting them. Again, if I had had one drink, it would have been considered manslaughter. Even though in both cases, these people had endangered their lives and MINE, yet I would have gone to jail. Yes, it is a money maker for the cities and the police department. No one should drive drunk, but no one should have their lives taken away over a couple of drinks.

I see people putting on make-up, eating, talking on the phone, listening to loud music and wrestling with their friends while driving and swerving and endangering others. I guess it follows that there should be laws against the radio, phone, talking to friends, eating, and all sorts of other stupid things people do in their cars. Then we would have more things to sue over,there would be more money for the insurance companies, city and the police.

Face it people its BACK DOOR PROHIBITION. Our rights are being whittled away and they tell us its for our own good. It's so they can make more money!!

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

I think the laws are extreme. Yes, we do need to protect everybody and if you are drunk you should be punished but look at it this way... a 125lb woman who drinks 2 glasses of wine over a 4 hour time span is legally drunk in NY.....was she drunk? I don't think they should rely so much on the breathalyzer, you should be judged on your behavior and what traffic laws you broke. The cops that hang out near bar/club parking lots don't have the right to pull you over just because you left a bar. I do not drink, had club soda all evening, when I pulled out of the parking lot I was pulled over, allegedly for not signaling. The officer insisted I had been drinking and ask me to do a breathalyzer....guess what.....0.0 I filed a complaint that same evening.

Answer 4

In U.S. DUI laws are nothing more than Government Fundraisers. The rule of thumb should be that "The Punishment should fit the crime." Right now, that is definately not the case. Take Pennsylvania for example, the BAL is .08, the average person isnt drunk until .12.

-J.

Answer 5

I think we need DUI laws, but I think they have went a little extreme now with the limits. Of course, it is sad that someone driving home a mile or two that blows 0.08% BAC ends up loosing more freedoms than a rapist, who they let out early due to over population. You have to put it into perspective I think.

Answer 6

NO, nobody should be drinking and driving period. This is a ridiculous question, if your drunk and driving an accident is just waiting to happen. Just because you get lucky and make it home without killing anybody, doesn't mean you should get off scott free.

Answer 7

The thing is, you have to think about it this way... you may have hurt someone... but they stopped you before you got into a serious accident.

It's like arresting terrorists... if you are proven to have been plotting an attack... and they catch you before that, you are still going to prison ... even though you haven't yet committed the act.

Probably this conviction is lighter than what you would get if you actually hit someone.

Answer 8

this is not the assumption of capitalism that maximum persons are blaming, this is fairly that the marketplace isn't actual, and the government contributes to this while they are meant to be for the persons. super firms very own many of the smaller chains we shop at on a on a regular basis foundation. generally we're not making those connections. those firms have congress of their wallet. they are in a position to sell us meals with risky chemical compounds that reason illnesses and different terrible products like ciggarettes meanwhile we are locking up many good human beings for stupid issues like pot (criminal record generally makes it demanding to get a job additionally, which generally ability a million greater man or woman on the streets committing crimes and a million much less man or woman contributing to the financial device). think of approximately it; congress made invoice Gates divide his monopoly, yet seem on the oil industry. they might do in spite of they choose. We supply bailouts to vehicle makers, yet what approximately all the persons caught up interior the credit scam. (that's what credit is; a scam). and the humorous factor is they have had the technologies to make "clean" autos because of the fact the early 1900s. coverage, vehicle or wellbeing or in spite of, is usually a scam- or if this is well worth a damn, too costly for the common man or woman. the government desires to invade our own lives, yet make it much less complicated for super company to maximise earnings at our fee.

Answer 9

I ve had one DUI conviction and it sucks. I hate those MADD and SADD people make it where you cant even have 2 drinks and you are legally drunk. DUI is a money making scam for local goverments.

Answer 10

I think it has become a get rich quick scheme for the courts and police.
They keep dropping the blood alcohol levels so that they can arrest you easier.
With all the laws we have are we really free?