English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

G Bush seems to be a war monger and if he wants to invade another country, Mexico seems to be the best country, he could then control the immigration and take over all of Mexico's oil wells.

2006-06-29 07:50:03 · 12 answers · asked by pilot39@sbcglobal.net 1 in Politics & Government Military

12 answers

Hell i never thought of that ,good question though.

2006-06-29 07:54:33 · answer #1 · answered by Ms Scarlet 4 · 0 1

Liberals always imply things that turn out to be untrue. First off GW a war monger? We were attacked, have you forgotten? Forget WMD's for a moment, even though they were recently found in Iraq, are we fighting Al-Quada in Iraq? Yes! The late Alzarqowi, and his named successor! Have we taken Iraq's oil? No, that is what Russia and France were doing before the war, remember? It was a very big thing but covered somewhat by the media. I have never heard Bush mention invasion of Mexico, what kind of "war monger" mentality must YOU have to even imply such a thing?

2006-06-29 08:00:56 · answer #2 · answered by Rich E 3 · 0 0

How about 'no'. The idea here is to keep the american public from having to support half the world on their tax bill. We don't need mexico's oil, we don't need oil from venezuela, nor from the middle east, we can go right offshore and drill our own damn oil, and what we can't drill we can conserve and do without. Mexico can solve its' own problems, we've given them enough money by now that the only reason they haven't is they're still trying to play us to see how much more they CAN get out of us...who's got YOUR wallet? LOL

2006-06-29 07:53:54 · answer #3 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0 0

what's there to achieve from invading Mexico and Venezuela, both international places aren't any more even on the brink of any center jap us of a's resources. i imagine, American lives isn't nicely worth lack of life for a source that isn't fulfill individuals adequate, until eventually it really is resources which will very last individuals for centuries to come back, like those contained in the middle East.

2016-10-13 23:13:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

i say no. bc if we invade mexico, the country will be so messed up that more ppl are going to come to usa. so that wont "take care" of immigration.

about the oil. we should forget the oil. start thinking bout alternative energy resources. China enacted very agressive policies of alternative energy resources.

so, if we dont start thinking a little bit like the Chinese. we are going to be screwed.

2006-06-29 08:30:21 · answer #5 · answered by azlu3 1 · 0 0

Why not? Pemex is just Texaco gear that was nationalized by MX, anyway. Take it back, I say.


Put them Mexicans to work drilling and the economy will boom and there will be no illegal immigration problem. Why do you think that the land is rich , but the Mexicans are poor?

2006-06-29 07:57:49 · answer #6 · answered by tex 5 · 0 0

Don't forget Canada too. I really don't want Mexico, have you been there? Craphole. But I do like the thought.

2006-06-29 07:54:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

You people are a buch of ignorant ***! Well, should the US become a nazi empire I know who I'm taking out first!

2006-06-29 09:33:19 · answer #8 · answered by VJ 2 · 0 0

If that were to happen the senate would have to approve but that would be splitting our forces and make us weaker in Iraq

2006-06-29 07:53:32 · answer #9 · answered by lyra 3 · 0 0

BEING IN THE US NAVY, I SUGGEST CONSIDERING THAT THE UNITED STATES ISN'T A NAZI=-TYPE EMPIRE THAT ANNEXES COUNTRIES FOR NO APPARENT REASON EXCEPT WEALTH.

2006-06-29 08:19:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hell yeah, F them up and get me some cheaper gas while he is at.

2006-06-29 08:08:02 · answer #11 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers