English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should those advocating absteinance be banned from complaining about pornography, strippers, exotic dancers, sex toys like didos and vibrators etc. As surely thats why you tell someone to abstain as you want them intro that and not sexaul relationships with real people instead.

If nobody had to abstain from early teeange onwards and had a good sex life then there would be little need for the above.

You can't expect to repress people and expect them to have no release for the frustration...

What do you think the abstaining would do? play tiddlyinks?

2006-06-29 06:22:26 · 7 answers · asked by Joey 4 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

7 answers

Turn the question around if you will please!

Liberals believe in as little intervention and equality as is possible.

Many (and I accept not all), who support abstientance, would like to ban anything to do with personal freedom, which they see as a threat. Oh, and inter racial marriage...........and ban anyone who is not white and conservative. These folks so like to tell others what to do!

So. Don't ban them because in a demoracy you let them have their say and then you know who to vote for! And to take photos of, as they leave the sex shop!

But, they do have a right to have their views heard. And our right to agree or disagree..............

Off for a good w****

2006-06-29 06:36:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Well, I abstain from sex because, God designed it to take place between a man and his wife. I'm a very happy person because I know that I'm in God's will. I by no means feel repressed or frustrated on the contrary, I feel more like an overcomer, because I have control over my own body and I don't fell the need to succumb to any peer pressure. It's pretty sad that you think that the only way someone can live a fulfilled life is if they are sexually active. By the way I'm sure the majority of people that engage in those behaviors you mentioned aren't people who have made an independent decision to remain abstinent. Because I personally have no desire to get involved in any of that mess.

2006-06-29 06:46:23 · answer #2 · answered by ICUD 3 · 0 1

ok those issues for my section, and in all truth precisely wasn't invented for those ppl advertising abstaince. Abstaining for sex is a way of staying organic for your marriage better half. sex become fairly meant for professional-introduction. and some for enjoment. those toys were created for ppl who get drained of themselves, companions, because ppl won't be able to get sufficient their grasping , and the flesh is by no skill chuffed. yet that's yet another tale. If that become the case Beastiality become created for an same reason, it aint' ppl, and trust me if u've by no skill had it u cant bypass over, if sex become extremely freeing your genuine frustrations u does no longer ought to save doin it . it really is a sexual frustration and it is going to continually be void if u you're goin about sex the incorrect way. Have sex wit too many ppl, then u're a pimp,or whore, those 2 are very unclean issues, so u imagine about it. ( they're ailment distributors too)yet another component, anybody doesnt releases sexually b/c over 80% of ladies do not actually have an orgasm!!! Did u knw that??? That motives extra frustration dont u imagine???And u say it really is assume to remedy frustration..... yet sex is healthful and good for u if u're goin into it the right way. (Sorry see you later) t way. Sorry see you later

2016-11-15 10:26:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I do not get the question. I do not think any one should be forced to abstain it is their choice but I think sex toys can give an unrealistic few of sex and sexual reactions but I do not think free sex would be better it would creat far more problems in the long run. we need self respect to respect our own bodys not abuse them

2006-06-29 06:28:47 · answer #4 · answered by Sam's 6 · 0 0

We are supposed to live in a society that allows freedom and personal choice.Theres too much BIG BROTHER involvement already.Ban something or intimate that its forbidden,then everyone will want to try it.Let them make their own choice.When their wallet is empty ,t and family and friends have gone ,then they may rethink their choice

2006-06-29 06:47:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That is some of the most stupidly, absurd reasoning I've ever heard.

2006-06-29 06:43:03 · answer #6 · answered by oldman 7 · 0 0

They should be banned from ignoring the ten commandments.

2006-06-29 06:34:05 · answer #7 · answered by shortnotsilly 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers