science is nothing now? hmm?
2006-06-29 05:05:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
well because unlike most Crhstians athiest did read the bible.
Now there are way mroe ways how universe or humans were came into the place besides of creation or evolution.
Its Religious ppl who falsely trying to say there are 2 options and if you don't like evolution there fore Creation is the right one. Limiting mind in option always was the agenda of religion.
COncider that GOD create humans to start, give free will and from that humans begin evolution. How about GOD create alience and alience create US. Any way you want to go as long as you stop limiting your self.
No1 at least for now can prove or disprove GOD or universe birth. Its all theories.
The main concept that atheist and other normal ppl are arguing that if there is a GOD its not the biblical primitive being who has more sins than we do and perform primitive actions of imagination of ppl who lived 1000's years ago.
It's all in defenition of GOD.
and when you saying based on well nothing. You automaticly put your idea in the ppl's head. How cute. How about answer question like this. Are you going to stop lying to the ppl? is it yes or no? May be than you can see that sofism was right from start.
And let me note since your question means to dismiss science than how do you use medecine when you sick? I did not see any meds or procedures to cure ppl in the bible ( of cause when Jesus saved cripled men from demons) . So you take the science in your every day life but then you saying we all wrong. Funny
Therefore GOD exist.
2006-06-29 05:11:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by PicassoInActions 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
what is your argument that God DID create the universe? That it's in the bible? A book written by humans, that contains many contradictions and says that everything we know was created in 6 days? Doesn't mention Dinosaurs or any other extinct creature? There is no evidence that an omnipotent being did create the universe! Its very hard to prove a negative! And why do people have such a hard time believing that this things could happen by chance?
2006-06-29 05:12:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Darmok 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Christian bible has been proven false. We know the origins of it, and it's not what you think. It's a collection of old pagan fables, and the rules and regulations that you think God wants you to follow are nothing but old Hebrew laws.
It makes perfect sense that God didn't create the universe. It makes far less sense that he did. However, he very well may have. But regardless, the "god" I'm talking about, and the "god" you're talking about are two very different things. The Christian god is fictional. He is no more real than Zeus or Odin.
Do some research. It's all out there for you.
2006-06-29 05:22:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, considering that the TOTAL energy of the universe is 0, the argument is indeed, based on Nothing.
Please try to digest this information.
Matter is energy. Matter has gravity. Gravity is, in fact, negative energy. Total universal energy = 0
The law of conservation of energy holds true.
Creationists cannot explain origins at all. Saying "God did it" is not an explanation, because it is not tied to any objective evidence. It does not rule out any possibility or even any impossibility. It does not address questions of "how" and "why," and it raises questions such as "which God?" and "how did God originate?" In the explaining game, Atheists are far out in front.
2006-06-29 05:22:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by RED MIST! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's a controversy from incredulty. earlier we understood climate varieties, storms were God's wrath. earlier we understood ailment, ailments were observed as curses. at present, scientists can in person-friendly words speculate about events earlier a million Plank time after the large Bang. there is not any longer something in modern-day technology that excludes existence earlier the large Bang, and makes "something from no longer something" the in person-friendly words end of atheistic naturalism. I also needs to communicate about that undemanding experience arguments should not be utilized in those severe circumstances. certain, something coming from no longer something would not sound a danger to us, yet actually, we've under no circumstances considered something created, except in quantum fluctuations which look without reason. also i don't think of the word "something got here from no longer something" is wise if we do evaluate time to have began on the large Bang because "got here from" presupposes the existence of time. because the oft quoted Stephen Hawking wrote, "see you later because the universe had a initiating, lets think it had a author. yet when the universe is somewhat thoroughly self-contained, having no boundary or aspect, it would have neither initiating nor end; it would merely be. What position then, for a author?" inquiring for a reason for existence will be like asking what takes position on the sting of the earth. the different question (the position did this organic ability come from?) that you communicate over with is likewise replied in Hawking's a short historic previous of Time. "That merely will develop the question of the position the flexibility got here from. the reply is that the total ability of the universe is precisely 0. Now two times 0 is likewise 0. to that end the universe can double the quantity of effective remember ability and likewise double the unfavorable gravitational ability without violation of the conservation of ability."
2016-10-13 23:04:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they think this because if you look at christianity, there was no explination for evolution. which has been addressed in The Guran. God brought three books. The Torah, The Bible, and The Quran. The first two were tainted by the people writing them. The last was as soon as something was brought it was wrote down. In The Quran God makes a hint at evolution when God says Abraham and the upright ones. Saying that he rose some people up from being hunched over! This is not verbatum so please excuse any errors.
2006-06-29 05:07:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by m_ousley 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
True Atheists have just as much of a concept of the origins of existence as Theists do. Neither of us can possibly know. We can have faith, and that is it. When an Atheists states that God can not possibly exist in any form, that is a comment built upon beliefs and faith that there is not God. So, either way, the means by which all existence came into being is built upon faith.
2006-06-29 05:09:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by plastik 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do religious people believe that god created the universe based on...well...nothing?
2006-06-29 05:06:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mama Pastafarian 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why are religious people's assumption that god exists based on a book of mythology writtten by a bunch of lunatic barbarians running around in the desert killing nonbelievers 2-5000 years ago?
2006-06-29 05:42:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science has basically shed light that there indeed was a big bang. Before the big bang, there was nothing. So the big bang was a beginning. How is there a beginning, without there being a beginner? The science they use to justify their reasoning is being turned in favor of a creator. If only both sides of this issue could see that.
2006-06-29 05:08:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Nep-Tunes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋