Yes, I think it's all very plausible, and several well-respected, competent historians and researchers have independently expressed support for the concept to varying degrees.
Whether it is "all" true is hard to say, but it cannot be easily dismissed.
2006-06-29 05:00:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The book is fictional, you find it in the fiction isle. If jesus had a wife that is fine but people need to stop being so easily manipulated. The Priory of Sion does exist but under totally different circumstances. It would probably do you some good to read some non-fictional books for a change. This is just like Star Wars someone writes a good story and people start to think that it is fact. The author of the book you are refering to even said that it was fictional when the book came out, now, because the book is so popular he denies that it is fiction. WAKE UP PEOPLE.
2006-06-29 12:03:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by slatty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus Was Born Knowin That He Was Going To Die. I Don't Think He Would Have Married A Woman And Bore A Child Just To Hurt Them By Dying And leaving Them. That would HAve been Hurting Someone On Purpose, Which Is A Sin, Something Jesus Could Not Do.
2006-06-29 12:03:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Fizzle 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the Vatican is the gateway to hell and I think anything associated with it is not in keeping with the following and teaching of Jesus Christ. No, I do not believe any of the DaVinci Code by Dan Brown was true, but an intriguing work of creative authorship. Jesus did not have a wife and daughter and he didn't dodge death - it was his purpose as our redeeming Savior and then he rose again and ascended into heaven and will come again for those who worship him in Spirit and Truth.
2006-06-29 12:02:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by dph_40 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bible does not specify if Jesus was Marrid or Single, Straight or Gay, Mary magdalin was prostitute or not and wether Jesus had chilren or not.
What the romans wrote 100 years later is just as much likely to be fictitious as what Dan Brown wrote 2000 years later. If you were writing about something that happened in 1906, how factually acurate do you think it would be. Now 20th century had press, radio, photgraphy and Television and much higher rate of literaacy.
First century had none of those advantages...what do you think happened? Be logical!
2006-06-29 12:03:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by dude 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
THE REAL HISTORICAL ORIGIN OF THE PRIORY OF SION
Paul Smith
http://priory-of-sion.com/psp/id43.html...
The President of the 1956 Priory of Sion was André Bonhomme.
André Bonhomme was one of the four founding members of the Priory of Sion in Annemasse in 1956, along with Pierre Plantard. He is tired of being harassed by inquiries about the nature of the association and doesn't want any publicity – he refuses to be interviewed on television or on radio. He doesn't understand where people get the idea that the Priory was anything other than what it was – just a small club of friends.
This was the statement he made to the BBC in 1996:
"The Priory of Sion doesn't exist anymore. We were never involved in any activities of a political nature. It was four friends who came together to have fun. We called ourselves the Priory of Sion because there was a mountain by the same name close-by. I haven't seen Pierre Plantard in over 20 years and I don't know what he's up to but he always had a great imagination. I don't know why people try to make such a big thing out of nothing."
And to quote French Researcher Jean-Luc Chaumeil from his 1994 book ‘The Table Of Isis, Part 2, The Templars Of The Apocalypse: The Message Of A Sacred Enigma - Tales, Legends And Myths Of Rennes-le-Chateau’:
"Finally, the Priory of Sion was created in 1956. We were able to contact former members of this office, who all burst out laughing when we mentioned Rennes-le-Château. According to its former President, the association was at the time a "club for boy scouts" and NOTHING MORE….!"
And from the BBC 2 Timewatch documentary The History of a Mystery (1996):
"There's no evidence for a Priory of Sion until the 1950s; to find it, you go to the little town of St-Julien. Under French Law every new club or association must register itself with the Authorities, and that's why there's a dossier here showing that a Priory of Sion filed the proper forms in 1956. According to a founding member, this eccentric association took its name not from Jerusalem, but from a nearby mountain (Col du Mont Sion Alt. 786 m). The dossier also notes that the Priory's self-styled Grand Master Pierre Plantard, who is central to this story, has done time in jail."
Pierre Plantard was sentenced on 17 December 1953 by the court of St Julien-en-Genevois to 6 months in prison for breaking the French Law relating to "Abus de Confiance" (fraud and embezzlement).
The evidence for this is found in a letter written by the Mayor of Annemasse in 1956 to the Sub-Prefect of St Julien-en-Genevois, which can be found in the File that contains the 1956 Statutes of the Priory of Sion and the 1956 Registration Documents of the Priory of Sion.
"...in our archives we have a note from the I.N.S.S.E dated 15 December 1954 advising us that Monsieur Pierre Plantard was sentenced on 17 December 1953 by the court in St. Julien-en-Genevois to six months imprisonment for a ‘breach of trust’ under articles 406 and 408 of the Penal Code."
Articles 406 and 408 of the old-style Penal Code correspond to Articles 314-1, 314-2 and 314-3 of the present Penal Code. These articles are classified in Book III of the Code, ‘Crimes and offences against property’ – theft, extortion, blackmail, fraud, and embezzlement.
The Official Judicial Archives relating to Pierre Plantard’s criminal convictions and prison sentences are to be found in the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Thonon-les-Bains (this being the information as provided by Le Directeur des Archives départementales de la Haute-Savoie in the town of Annecy).
2006-06-30 21:38:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Why_so_serious? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope dont' think it's true but it makes for a great novel don't it.
2006-06-29 12:31:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by xx_muggles_xx 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question is incomprehensible. Try writing in English and I'll try to answer the question.
2006-06-29 12:03:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by grammartroll 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a work of fiction. Absolutely do not believe it.
2006-06-29 11:57:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Think.for.your.self 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, I don't think its true.
2006-06-29 12:00:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Candice H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋