You're right...Congress should share the blame. It's easier to get angry at one particular person and fault them instead of looking at a group of people and figuring out what to do with them. I'm again the war in Iraq and a lot of people are quick to blame just Bush for it but they need to look at the people that gave him permission to go there. Congress should be held responsible for this war just as much as Bush is.
2006-06-29 01:53:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kyleen G 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Harry Truman has a plaque on his desk that said the buck stops here. In Bush's case it is the bucks come here. The president sets the policy and the congress agree's or disagrees with it. In this case we have a rubber stamp repuglican congress that has only had the gonads to stand up to Bush in a few instances. Like the ports deal. But not very often for a person so mistaken to think he is the decider.
2006-06-29 01:57:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hint, clue, when Congress votes they vote Republican on every issue. Clue, Bu$h is a Republican.
Fact, Sept. 11th. was the greatest failure of our "Government" in the History of our nation to protect Americans. In the "Corporation" we fire failures.
Those that voted for Bu$h and Republicans in Congress would do it again if they could, they have no regrets. They still think they did the right thing for the Country by Voting for "tax Cuts for every American". Republicans making over $300,000 a year could care less how many American die in Iraq, Republicans also care less about the $2 trillion cost of war in Iraq. Republicans will not pay it. They want others to pay for that mistake. Republicans also don't care at all about the debt run up by Republicans in Congress, which will suck the pockets of the working class for 30 years to come. Republicans also don't care that Government is bigger now not smaller. Many have Government jobs at Local, State and Federal levels. Republicans also don't care that we have 22 million illegals, they want more not less..
BTW, I did not get a tax cut, my taxes are higher under Republicans not lower.
2006-06-29 02:20:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is no excuse for how congress has been carrying out agency. congress -democrat and republican- ought to thoroughly wiped sparkling out and new congress human beings must be elected; even though this would not excuse the president for his betrayal of the yank human beings. confident, congress does fund the war; even though if congress did no longer fund the war, the troops may be the only ones who go through. needless to say bush is a obdurate 'guy', there is no longer something to assert he would not keep the troops there till he gets the investment he needs. NAFTA is a important rationalization for the deficit. democrats are strongly against NAFTA presently. the agency of the subsequent president must be to reform the settlement. congress ought to accomplish that, even though it may be troublesome to get via the bush administration. congress voted for the patriot act based on the 'advice' the bush administration provided them with. you're terrific suited congress does have greater ability than bush; even though, congress ought to additionally intently create charges that bush won't veto or sit down on. intently coming up those charges ability bearing in concepts the yank public's desires and determining no rely if the invoice will please the president. edit selection one: your question mentioned deficit. it did no longer say 'government deficit'. selection 2: the patriot act is a shaggy dog tale, yet even though congress replaced into advised that it replaced into the terrific, maximum appropriate thank you to discover terrorists. in the event that they hadn't exceeded it and yet another terrorist hit, they could have been blamed. that's worry-free politics. selection 3: of direction NAFTA replaced into exceeded via democrats and democrats have considering the fact that found out the blunders of NAFTA and are calling for a revision. NAFTA replaced into created to convey artwork to impoverished countries yet has been abused via grasping firms and huge agencies.
2016-10-31 22:02:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by harib 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because little children around him were good with computer games.
They rigged all the info with words and numbers for ratings and glamour of the executive suites and life-styles.
Those antiques with creaky legs walked out on him with miscommunication and communication failures.
The Boss became sitting duck with the opposition throwing the pots and pans at him in office.
Should have listen to those antiques who were there to help him to hold the fortress.
What can little children do?
2006-06-29 03:19:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's easier to blame than to find answers for change.
2006-06-29 01:54:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he is the man in charge
2006-06-29 01:52:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by boy_jam_arch 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most people are too lazy to write that much hate mail. they usually send bombs
2006-06-29 01:52:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stacy R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i agree
2006-06-29 01:52:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by lexie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋