2006-06-29 00:47:16 · 8 answers · asked by Martin K 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Yes. But that depends on who you listen to in the news business. The International Red Cross has estimated that over 200,000 Iraqi's have been victims of collateral damage. Included in this group are massive amounts of women and children who have been murdered, wounded, and maimed for life. George Bush puts the number around 30,000 to 50,000. At least 130,000 to 150,000 Iraqi's have been displaced due to the Bush invasion and occupation of Iraq.
2006-06-29 00:54:04 · answer #1 · answered by fenx 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Not True, It just seems that way because of the news. The question you should address is why are there more Americans dying on our streets then there are in the war.
2006-06-29 07:55:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If you look at the number of people who were killed under his dictatorship, it was much worse! Living under his regime was much like living under Hitler's term. If you said something, or did something that his people didn't like, you would simply disappear. Read the news. They are constantly finding mass graves with hundreds of corpses in them, and most if not all of those people were killed because of "something" they supposedly did while Hussein was in power.
2006-06-29 07:54:18 · answer #3 · answered by StormCat 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. More people die from natural causes per day in any major city than die from the war in Iraq.
2006-06-29 07:50:26 · answer #4 · answered by not_prfikt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah.war is hell No matter how U say it ,it suck as real people say good-by 2 life again and again...what does war mean ABSOLUTELY nothing...PeAxE
2006-06-29 08:06:19 · answer #5 · answered by michael looooou 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope, saddam was working on a world record over there.
2006-06-29 08:45:43 · answer #6 · answered by jordanjd4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes and more and more people are kidnapped there
2006-06-29 07:51:28 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-06-29 07:52:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋