a decent job and education?
2006-06-28 21:17:56 · 13 answers · asked by chicalinda 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Ditto Grail Hunter!!
2006-06-28 21:57:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was called the Persian Empire back then. And sure, if they sided with the Union and ended the war more quickly, it might have been a good thing. Your rhetoric is pretty weak, if you are trying to say "well, we wouldn't like it if we had been invaded."
I seriously doubt the Persians were anti-slavery. The entire world was pro-slavery back then. Every major empire had slaves. Yes, even our peace-loving native american tribes, which had been in constant war for millenia over land that "no one can own".
I know this because I am a descendant of Native Americans, and I haven't been brainwashed by the public school system into thinking that natives were all tree-huggers. They fought like vicious warriors, and would have kicked white people's a$$es if it weren't for those pesky guns.
Maybe if my people had been a part of the Renaissance, we would have been aware of gunpowder.
Ok so I am only 1/8 native American. We were mostly wiped out. What do you want from me? Feathers and facepaint?
Two of my great grandparents were natives. (Not that race should matter.)
2006-06-29 04:44:53 · answer #2 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, although they couldn't have won a war with sticks against guns. They are a bunch of fanatics who have no regard for human life so they could have cared less what we were doing in the first place. We as a county could at least discuss our wrongs and then correct them. They are only interested in blowing others up that don't have the same views. We have made many mistakes as a country, but have righted our wrongs eventually. Iraq doesn't care about right and wrong, they only care about the status quo.
2006-06-29 08:06:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
omg!! most of those who answered your questions are so sooooooooo ignorant. it's very sad!
one said that iraq didnt even exist as a nation!! interestinf mr know it all!! read some history dumb a$$.
and the other said that the iraqis were chasing camels back then!!
another dumb A$$ you need to get your head out of your A$$ and if you are such a moron perhaps you shouldnt even be answering questions.
god i hope you people try to teach yourselves a little. i bet you are one of those people who get lost in thier own town.
sorry questioner didnt get to answer your question as i got kinda angry. i get angry when i see morons like those.
2006-06-29 04:36:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nations shouldn't invade other nations. Period.
I'm pretty sure "Pre-emptive war" is a fancy new term created to ensure military contractors have no lulls in their profits.
2006-06-29 04:27:49 · answer #5 · answered by Mesa P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At that time the world didnt need oil so the iraqies were still chasing camels in the desert to collect their **** to cook by.
2006-06-29 04:23:11 · answer #6 · answered by kiss 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you mean besides the fact that iraq as a nation didn't exist in the mid 19th century?
2006-06-29 04:23:07 · answer #7 · answered by parisucks 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Intruding on a group of people because they went psycho is their own problem not ours. No they should have went to the psyciatrist's office.
2006-06-29 06:35:52 · answer #8 · answered by Slick1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We invated Germany in WWII, they didnt attack us first
We invated Korea, they didn't attack us first
We invated Vietnam, they didnt attack us first
The terrorist attacked us on 9/11, but we cant invate the countries that harbors terrorist?
2006-06-29 06:11:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes they should have invaded while they had the chance. unfortunately carpets wouldn't start.
2006-06-29 04:22:31 · answer #10 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋