He's a basically good guy who's in over his head. I feel the same way about Carter as prez.
BTW - Bush has made a lot of mistakes, but the gas prices aren't his fault. Basic economics. Supply is down + demand (world-wide) is up = high prices.
2006-06-29 08:02:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Smart Kat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that if the rest of the planet baned together and conquered the United States because of this senseless aggression in Iraq, Bush and most of his cronies would swing from the gallows just like the war criminals at Nuremberg.
2006-06-28 17:21:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I voted for him, and am not to fond of him at this time. That does not mean that he is personally responsible for every ill in the country, especially those that have roots years, even decades before his coming into office.
I think that many people hate the idea of Bush, and refuse to make decisions on a case by case basis.
I also suspect that you hate spell check as well.
2006-06-28 17:08:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by electricpole 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I support him 100%. He has great vision and passion for this country. People forget what started the war in Iraq, and that 83% were for it. He is by far and away the best leader since Reagan.
2006-06-28 17:04:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by mjcariati1971 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Better than the media that only reports the news it chooses to report. Did you read this:
It has been confirmed across the board that 18-wheelers were seen going into Syria before the war, crossing the border soon after Iraqi intelligence replaced the border guards and cleared nearby areas for their passage. There are also eyewitness reports of the trucks going into Syria, and eyewitness reports of their burial in Lebanon.
The trucks with the weapons were tracked to three locations in Syria and Lebanon's Bekaa Valley, currently controlled by the Syrians, Iranians and Hezbollah. Sources I've spoken with that have seen satellite photos of the movements confirm that the WMD in Syria are at military bases, while the ones in Lebanon are buried. A fourth site in Syria, the al-Safir WMD and missile site, should also be looked at. From spring to summer 2002, there was a lot of construction here involving the expansion of underground complexes.
We have tremendous testimony as well, by General Georges Sada, the former second-in-command of Saddam's Air Force that 56 flights took place on converted Iraqi Airways planes in the summer of 2002 to transport weapons, along with a ground shipment. He claims to know the pilots involved. A second Iraqi general, Ali Ibrahim al-Tikriti, in an interview I published, confirmed in detail the movement of WMD into Syria saying that discussion on such a move went back to the 1980s. He claims his sources for this include Iraqi scientists and others in the regime that were very close to him even after he defected. He confirmed to me that Russian vehicles, including ones equipped to handle hazardous materials, were used. Reports of WMD being moved out of Iraq to Syria go back to 1997, and it is believed by many that weapons were moved in and out of Iraq using Syria routinely since the mid-1990s.
The Italian media also reported that their intelligence services had information indicating that in January and February of 2003, Iraqi CDs full of formulas and research work along with tubes of anthrax and botulinum toxin were sent off to Syria. By the end of February, Iraqi WMD expertise was already in Syria including a top nuclear physicist.
An Iraqi scientist also led Coalition forces to hidden stockpiles of precursor chemicals that could be used to make chemical and biological weapons. The scientist said some facilities and weapons were destroyed, and the rest were sent to Syria. Syrian defectors are also claiming that Syria is where the weapons are, along with Representative Curt Weldon's source in his new book. The Prime Minister of Albania even stated that based on information he has which is not available to the media, he cannot rule out such a transfer.
There is also a report that an Iraqi medium-range al-Hussein missile on a truck moved into Syria, and in the early stages of the war, was spotted briefly coming into Iraq, operating its radar overnight, and returning to Syria. Most reports about the transfer indicate missiles were included in the transfers.
I didn't think you had heard of it.
2006-06-28 17:45:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark W 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The most divisive President in over a century.
2006-06-28 17:04:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by mojo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
War criminal. Traitor to the United States. Sith apprentice.
2006-06-28 17:02:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by PO_GORG 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like Bush.
He's a good man who truly wants what is best for the US. He's not the perfect president, but no one ever will be. And if people think he's bad and say childish things like "they hate him"....HAHA...just wait and see what happens if another democrat is put in office.
2006-06-28 17:01:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Emma 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is a pompus egotistical manic with delusions of god hood what a waist of a perfectly bad human
2006-06-28 17:02:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by brighterthanyou 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the man is doing the best he can. Everything happened after he became president and with all the whiners and people who hate him, I think he has done well. He isn't stupid; he made better grades than Kerry and I think his patience is remarkable. I would tell the whiners to "shove it".
2006-06-28 17:05:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Aggierose 1
·
0⤊
0⤋