Chicken and egg debate unscrambled
Egg came first, 'eggsperts' agree
Friday, May 26, 2006; Posted: 7:33 a.m. EDT (11:33 GMT)
LONDON, England -- It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?
Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.
Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.
Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.
Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.
The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.
"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."
The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.
Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.
He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.
"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.
"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."
Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.
He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."
The debate, which may come as a relief to those with argumentative relatives, was organized by Disney to promote the release of the film "Chicken Little" on DVD.
2006-06-28 12:10:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
The egg came first. Yes, it's been proven. The embryo of the first chicken was inside an egg, therefore the egg came first. You can also say that the first chicken came out of the first chicken egg.
It's based on the theory of evolution.
2006-06-28 12:02:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by TheAnomaly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some would say that since “God” made all life on this world, it would have to be the chicken. Others say that through the process of evolution, the egg would eventually evolve from a less complex organism to the form of a common chicken over the course of thousands of years. Big debate, but I say egg (for the explaination above)
2006-06-28 12:06:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Vincent 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dinosaurs layed eggs long before chickens were even on this earth. Therefore the egg came first!
2006-06-28 12:03:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question gets asked a lot. It's a matter of opinion, of course, but I say the egg came first.
2006-06-28 12:04:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by kja63 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
God made the chicken first, as with all amimals amd humans as well.
Eggs are the way chickens reproduce .
So the chicken was first.
2006-06-28 12:07:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by marvs36 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
As long as you are a believer in The Bible, when the Earth was created God put animals on it as a form. Therefore, the chicken was first. God didn't put the egg on Earth and say, "Now what ya gonna do?"
2006-06-28 12:14:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by braushubby1992 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The chicken because, according to the old joke, God couldn't lay an egg.
2006-06-28 12:05:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by karen wonderful 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's an easy one: the egg. They weren't chicken eggs, of course.
2006-06-28 12:04:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by ksarul 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask the Chicken.
2006-06-28 12:04:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by You'llneverguess 4
·
0⤊
0⤋