Can you prove scientifically that god exist ?

Answer 1

If you can Deny Scientifically that DEATH will not take you over and you will live forever... then ofcourse I can prove that GOD exists.

If you can Scientifically prove who taught man to Speak...from being an Ape.. well.. you yourself will know Scientifically that GOD exists

Answer 2

no. if you are working with a christian god and a reductionist science theory (these are the two most popular models)

reductionist theroy is (very simply) to reduce: stating an egg is made out of a shell a white and a yolk. the white is made out of protien, the protien out of cells, the cells out of atoms, the atoms out of protons and electrons, and electrons made out of up quarks and down quarks, see! no god. not anywhere.
god is not made out of anything, nothing at all, not energy, not matter, not nothing. nothing to reduce. Scientifically God cant exist, no room. If one were interested in proving gods existence you would have to overcomb the science element by saying that there is something that the scientist is missing some non-physical thing. When it comes to non-physical things scientists suck. I am personally not interested in proving god exists. I am much more interested in the nature of god.

Why? because I am more interested in the social policies of God and christianity than the philosophical, I already investigated, theology, it is like chasing your tail. If I believe in god then do I have to take jesus too? if I take jesus then all of the bible as well? If all of the bible then all the church? if all of the church then all of the priests? If all of the priests then all of the parishes? Where does the line stop. I dont believe all the way up the line, but my sourse for info comes from either the bottom of the line or the bottom of the line that died 2000 years ago after writing a book, and calling it the "Truth".

Answer 3

No one can prove scientifically that god, any god, exists. The concept of god or gods is not something that lends itself to scientific testing.

And basically, if a thing is not capable of DISproof, it is not scientific. To be scientific, a thing has to be able to be disproved. That is, a test must be available that would show the thing is either existent or is not existent. There is no such test for god, gods, angels, and so on. In other words, all sorts of things can be said to show that God or angels or spirits exist, but there are no things that will show that they don't.

So the concept of god is unscientific. But of course, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence," also.

Science only goes so far, because science only does what it does the way it does it [otherwise it would not be science]. It is not concerned with matters that lie outside its parameters.

Religions often act as if science is challenging them, is against them. But in reality, science is not making any comments against religion, it is merely doing science and making statements about how the world works, quite as if there were no religions at all.

So to say, "The concept of god is not scientific because it is one of those things that has no test by which to disprove it," does not say that there is no god, that there is a god, that science is "anti-god," etc. It only says that God is not a scientific proposition. It is people who have decided that if a thing is not scientific it is not true. So therefore, when science says it cannot prove or disprove God, they think that science is saying there is none, when in fact it is saying there is no proof either way by the scientific method.

Answer 4

I don't agree with the question, but right now I have a bigger problem with the answers.
A. Yeah you can scientifically prove that sound waves exist.
B. Yes you can prove that wind exists.
Geez...

Ok so no you can't prove scientifically that he doesn't exist. It's all on belief. You also can't prove scientifically that he doesn't. Evolution did occur, I'm not denying that, but if you ever think about the big picture, like how we all came to be from little tiny zooplankton, what gave that little zooplankton life ya know?

Answer 5

The answer is no. The Scientific method involves making a hypothesis, setting up a control group, testing the hypothesis, and observing what occurs. Because, God is not a material being it would be impossible to conduct any type of test. Anyone who tells you that they have scientific proof for God’s existence or nonexistence is in error. You cannot use a method for studying material entities on a nonmaterial being. The study of God is beyond the scope of science.

Answer 6

If you mean by that can we measure Him, (because that's ALL science really does), no. BUT, there are some very good logical arguments for the existence of a Deity Who is, and by the very nature of Deity, must be; infinite, eternal, omnipotent and omniscient. Look them up. They're the Five Arguments of St. Thomas Aquinas. The two best are the ontological and the teleological.

However, that still doesn't answer the real question: ie, why should a person give a flying fickle finger of fate whether or not there is a God?

Answer 7

No but you can't prove scientifically that he doesn't exist. It's a matter of faith. However, there is some science that attempts to prove that there is a creator. Read The Case for a Creator by Lee Strobel. It's a pretty fast read if you get the student edition. Only 95 pages. It discusses the science of intelligent design.

Answer 8

Actually no you can't. Just like you can't scientifically that God doesn't exist. It's all a matter of faith. Which in a way is interesting... Think about it: if you could prove his existence, then he would be something with physical properties. I find it a lot more fascinating that he is beyond our own tiny,closed, finite universe.

Answer 9

The concept or belief in God is not a result of fear in its origination but to its realization. For example, when it rains, you use an umbrella to protect yourself against rain but before the thought of using the umbrella, did not the umbrella exist? Of course God is Higher, and if we were able to see God, would that make him more worthy of worship or less? Scientifically you have to believe in God b/c matter is based on cause and effect so it can not go indefinitely unless matter is perfect and eternal, which it is not b/c matter continuously changes but some thing perfect would not require change b/c it is sustained by itself. So matter has a end, but none the less if you believe that matter always existed and is perfect, who was the Decision Maker to initiate the original change of creation, since you believe in its eternity, you must accept it as perfect in the first place. Thus God must be in the formula as the Originator of creation and its attributes of cause and effect.

Answer 10

Can you prove scientifically that God doesn't exist?

Answer 11

Can you prove scientifically that God doesn't exist ?