What books are supposed to be in the Bible that are not actually published books of the Bible?

Answer 1

I couldn't list them all for you if I wanted to. There are more that were rejected than there were that were approved. Everyone that has suggested looking up Apochrypal texts is on the right track. The life of Adam and Eve was a good one from the old testament. The Book of Enoch, The gospels of Mary, and Judas, Peters Revalations. Those are just a few of the interesting ones.

Answer 2

None. All of the books which some people *claim* ancient rulers/leaders/aliens took out of the Bible were never accepted to begin with. Neither Constantine nor any "ecumenical council" chose the books of the Bible, but rather the early church accepted all the old testament books which were accepted by the Jews as being written by prophets, and they accepted all the new testament books which were written by an apostle or a companion of an apostle. Anything written later, containing error, or by somebody unknown was rejected.

Answer 3

I have two books at home called the Forgotten books Eden and the lost books of the bible. They contain many scriptures that were not put into the bible. You can find them on the Internet under lost books of the bible, there you can get a list of scriptures on line. A few of them are the gospel of Peter, the Infancy, the book of Enoch. In addition there are the Apocrypha which were mentioned earlier.

Answer 4

There are none. All that are inspired are in the bible now. Some will tell you that there are others but if you read any of them, you can see they are not inspired as they go against some other parts that are there. Some things were written as fiction as they do today to enhance the storyline and make things a bit juicier for the reader. Some of the books are in the Catholic bible but you will not find them anywhere else as some of them speak of things only taught in the Catholic church and much was written by them.

Answer 5

There are actually many gospels of Christ that didn't make it into the cannon (tome) of the new testament. Several of these passages or books are actually older than the current gospels. some of 'The NagHammadi Codex', 'The Book of Thomas' and the new discovery of 'The Book of Judas' are chronologically older than most of the current gospels in the bible. These omissions from the cannon are typically called by the incorrect term 'Apocryphal' : (of counterfeit; of doubtful authorship or authenticity) The current inclusion of 'The Book of Revelations' is of the most debatable topic sense it's content seems to include political agendas. In short The New Testament of Jesus Christ (The Bible) is a compilation of the church.

Answer 6

There are no books that should have been in the bible ,but are not. God saw to it that what He wanted was put in the bible and preserved. Other accounts or viewpoints were not supposed to be included in the inspired word of God.

Answer 7

none. if u r getting into the whole da vinci code thing, in some asian contry a few years ago, some dude found some ancient artifacts that spoke about jesus and his decipals, but no one can be certain what they really say b/c they were torn in some places. In the bible it also says that whoever changes some of the verses in it, they r suposed 2 b put 2 death.

Answer 8

if there was suppose to be another book in the bible than god would have allowed it to be there. The books of the bible the bible itself is allowed because god let it

Answer 9

The Protestant bible is missing: Sirach, Tobit, Wisdom, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, and Baruch, as well as longer versions of Daniel and Esther.

Answer 10

Imagine this...The books that are supposed to be in the bible are ACTUALLY in the Bible...