USA and Allied entered in Iraq and Afghanistan and destroyed them without UN permeation.Is anyone question?

Question

(please ignor the spelling mistake) USA(world super power)and allied entered in Iraq and Afghanistan,whithout any permeation from UN, claiming that they are having weapon of mass destruction and biological as well.After the both countries destroyed compleatly,the people of both countries are suffering lot more then before.The USA's and other agencies have declared that,'there were no such weapons found'.Now the question is, 'why from any country of international community inclouding permanent members of Securty concel did not move any resolation to ask USA and Alied the responsibility of killing thousands of peoples and there properties and why there is no one asking internationl court of justes for there war crime.Is that mean, all the countries of international community are afraid from them.Now due to no one asking them for there craimes,the are going to repeat the same in Iran.

Answer 1

We had no permission to enter Germany, Japan, Panama, Grenada, Haiti, Yugoslavia, nor Italy.... Where were the protests then?

Answer 2

you really do need to work on your spelling...its bad enough to make it hard to understand what you are asking. There is a spell check tool on here.

First of all, America, before Bush too, doesn't recognize ICJ authority over it.

Secondly, The UN is a loose association of sovereign countries and anytime anyone asks the UN's opinion it is out of courtesy only. The United States, or any other country for that matter, doesn't need permission from the UN to invade another country.

Third, even if the government is saying there were no WMDs, that doesn't mean that there weren't. there could be national security reasons for not releasing the information.

Fourth, WMDs were not the only valid reason for invading these countries. Iraq was harboring terrorists, and I believe that has been proven. Afghanistan was not harboring terrorists, it was being run by them. Plus, the vast quantitiesof illegal drug imports they sent to our country every year is more than enough reason to invade, without any other extenuating circumstances.

Fifth, there is no basis to say that the people of both countries are suffering more than they were before. They are suffering, yes, and in different ways. But there is no way to quantify that its more now than it was before. Iraq especially, is doing a lot of short term hurting now with the lingering violence, (and i think that could have been avoided if the war itself had been handled differently from its inception), but the people of Iraq are gaining an infrastructure that hopefully will keep another dictator from power in their new democracy. If that is done right, the generation suffering now will be deemed heroes and martyrs to the following generations that enjoy the freedoms that this generation can only dream of. Their government won't be just like America's. Our government is unique to us and would not work for other democracies, but that doesn't mean government has to go from the one extreme of tyranny to the near the other, of the democratic repuplic that is America's government. (all the way to the other extreme would be anarchy)

p.s. i would like to comment on the wild-man of borneo's post. First of all, what on earth are you trying to say? Secondly, this is a kid that's interested in learning or at the very least debating what is going on in the world. These kids are few and far between, as adults we should help them see all sides of the picture so that they can learn and expand their horizons. Patronizing them, as you have done here, only inhibits the exchange of ideas and open debate. Shame on you. I think that your post is substantially more juvenile than the asker's post.

Answer 3

Why did Iraq and Afghanistan no longer safeguard their own complications and oust the dictators... They needed help and american stepped as a lot because the plate because it consistently has to guard the folk from atrocities.. We merely were given 2 vacationers back from Iran the different day. america of a became no longer there...

Answer 4

little one,
When allied forces moved into any conflicts without the UN.
Something extra ordinary had happened which explained why they overide the UN.
They were not out there at their own whims and fancy.
They were there for a purpose which you do not see with what had gone wrong out there on planet earth.
The conflict in Iraq was created by the little ones like you spreading ghost stories in playng computer games with your Freedom of speech.
Now do you understand an old saying " Children are to be seen and not to be heard " which does not change with time but stays in time on planet earth.
Do you see why playing computer games with Freedom of speech is a very dangerous games for your brothers and sisters with self lack of knowledge with what went wrong out there on planet earth?

Answer 5

After 9/11 we gave the Taliban an opportunity to hand over Osama or face the consequences. They knew what would happen and yet they chose not to turn him over to us. We did not "Destroy Afghanistan" we removed the Taliban from power. I am sure you are aware that the Taliban are not the most compassionate group, especially to women.

Answer 6

becuase UN is under the pocket of us so, even without un permission, the us and his allies will go and make war with iraq and afghanistan

Answer 7

Don't need UN permission to do the right thing - UN's role should only be humanitarian... no teeth!

Answer 8

lksjdfa; lkjsdoief hfhioeheb fsafwkebd ofddfkasjd hdklf kldfhsdf oehuwe noew odwen,sowe sldfowenbl,wzwow

nice speeeling

Answer 9

Well, Yoda, we don't need UN permission. Plus, we fund and host the UN.

Answer 10

Why do you think Bush refused to recognise the International War Crimes Court. ????????