It is said that as long as there are a minimum of two people living on this planet, there will be war! Why run away from the truth then?
Human race will ultimately end up in a war of its own making. Do you agree or has the human race evolved enough to prevail in peace?
2006-06-28 00:01:58 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
rationalism my dear!
2006-06-28 00:05:55 · answer #1 · answered by Vee 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Humans are also predisposed to fear. Anyone that's been in a war can tell you they were scared as hell at least at first, and still scared or at least very uptight later. People not sharing in the risk, at least psychologically, will always show only the flight reflex. While those in combat or feeling connected to the mission or troops will tend to feel the fight reflex.
I always thought that after 9/11 the US should have rationed certain resources even though it was not strictly necessary, if for no other reason than to generate the WWII shared risk/sacrifice psychology. A lot of good could have been done on gas prices in the process by regulating demand, and it wouldn't be hard to sell on the "reliance on foreign oil" perspective. A draft has more negative effects than positive, but rationing we could have pulled off. Now, even if a super public speaker is elected next, it will be difficult for him to bring the country back on our side.
2006-06-28 07:16:05 · answer #2 · answered by djack 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You see the noisy minority, the silent majority are ignored. Politicians are destroying the world with their need to appease the left wing, tree hugging, mud people. I would vote for a politician who had an intellect. Most have the intellectual agility of a small soap dish. The world will overflow with gene pool slurry before someone does something, without first thinking of voters. I am the silent majority and if i were to become king, Iz would strike dem bulldykes down an iz would resurect some good old boyz an Hanibal da canibal wud bez ma man. If i kept writing for another hour i would make even less sense. what is in this whiskey?
2006-06-28 07:17:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
how very right you are.....throughout most of history people have tried to deny natural human nature in the belief that civilized societies have no reason for war when in reality all it does is give more reason for war.....take the indians for example, now dont get me wrong they did have wars however there was no war over land because they firmly believed that no "man" could own something that owned him.............possession is a definite evil and ultimately will probably be the cause of mans downfall on earth...i mean if you think about it land ownership is pretty much the main staple of most wars and has been throughout history.................................i dont care how evolved or civilized we become if we cannot learn to accept that no country needs to own everything and that we should stop pushing our ideals(religion&politics)on other cultures our existance will come to a quick and gruesome demise....
2006-06-28 07:17:59 · answer #4 · answered by alss03 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are correct ! No one wants war, but if it were not for war then history would be completely different from what we know it now. For example we would be speaking German or Japanese, if it were not for our brave Veterans.
Most according to their age are protesting because of the fear of losing their own life, or have lost a loved one in other wars. If you ask a veteran the majority will always tell you they would gladly go back in place of one of our young men or women to spare them the anguish or suffering war causes during the fight and after for the rest of their lives.
Always remember tho that many of your freedoms you enjoy are thanks to those who chose to stand and fight. So if you love your freedom, THANK A VET ! as the bumper sticker says!
2006-06-28 07:49:51 · answer #5 · answered by Armywife52 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought your actual question was "How come so many Pacifists and anti-war Ls?" so I'll answer that:
Pacifism and anti-war lobbying is in fact a form of war - you are fighting against people committing acts of war.
Nice little oxymoron, eh? Pacifism = fighting!
2006-06-28 07:45:19 · answer #6 · answered by say_it_straight9 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well we should do so becuase who knows whats out there. wouldnt it be more interesting to fight another race of beings and be untied as a human race? but i definatly agree that war is natural. so does darwin!
2006-06-28 07:06:31 · answer #7 · answered by T-RoZ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah you are just so right war has always seved a purpose i mean look at how well the crusades went or vietnam or korea or wait a minute ........ this cluster **** quagmire we are in right now called iraq......yeah you are a genius we should all just kill each other for our differences ...... its not like reading from books or learning from others ever helped improve society
2006-06-28 12:22:15 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't buy it.
I think some are predisposed to power and greed and want business to take over the world!
2006-06-28 07:14:48 · answer #9 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think daily life will be dodging bullets and seeing rocket bombs fly trough the air
yeah i think planet earth will end up in global war 50 times as deadly
2006-06-28 07:08:47 · answer #10 · answered by x_cybernet_x 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF LIBS OUT THERE I DON'T LIKE WAR BUT I HATE WHAT HAPPENED ON 9-11-01
2006-06-28 07:52:35 · answer #11 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋