why was the BABRI mosque demolished in India ????

Question

so they cud make a tempel there

isnt this unfair!!!!!
they cud have made that temple somewhere else too.. why demolish a mosque for that...
there was so much resistance to this by the muslims all over the world... But the indian govt showed itself to be a true HINDU FANATIC!

nope.. muslims didnt destroy hindu temples when they came to india....
i'v read the indian history n i dont think that anything like this existed...

Answer 1

You have not read India's history you are a liar. when muslim invaded India they butchered millions of hindus and looted and demolished most of their temple.

In Ayodhya there was temple of Rama (main god for hindus) When Babar got victory, he demolished the Rama temple and made a mosque there and it was called Babri Maszid.

For the last 150 years the mosque was not used for offering Namaz because most of the Islamic clerics ruled that this place is unholy for being a Mosque.

The building was all broken and dilapilated and was not used for mosque

hindus who had been reclaiming the place to re-build their temple there, broke the already broken structure.

The name Babri maszid was given by the Politicians of India just get votes of muslims

After the demolition of this structure muslim demolished 200 temples in India, 150 in Bangla desh and 20 in Pakistan.

The history of Islam is full of cruelty, blood-shed, and violence. Please read again the books on muslim's invasion on India and come back.

There is still no problem, if you muslim repent on your past deeds and promise to be peaceful now, Allaha will forgive you

Hindus have already forgiven you for tyranny
------------------------------------------
Rian30 has given sources to confirm this read :
"Hindus too experienced this treatment at the hands of Islamic conquerors, e.g. when Mohammed bin Qasim conquered the lower Indus basin in 712 CE. Thus, in Multan, according to the Chach-Nama, "six thousand warriors were put to death, and all their relations and dependents were taken as slaves". This is why Rajput women committed mass suicide to save their honour in the face of the imminent entry of victorious Muslim armies, e.g. 8,000 women immolated themselves during Akbar's capture of Chittorgarh in 1568 (where this most enlightened ruler also killed 30,000 non-combatants).
-Koenraad Elst
"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history". The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period. "

(source: The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage - By Will Durant


"Mahmud utterly ruined the prosperity of the country, and performed those wonderful exploits, by which the Hindus became like atoms of dust scattered in all directions, and like a tale of old in the mouth of the people."

(source: Alberuni's India. - By C Edward Sachau

“India has been a wounded civilization because of Islamic violence: Pakistanis know this; indeed they revel in it.....................prosper... country; the Muslims created a terrorized civilization out of what was the most creative culture that ever existed.”

(source: OutlookIndia.com, 15 November 1999 and http://www.indpride.com/vsnaipaul.html)....

"From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of 'a holy war' of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races." Mahmoud Ghazni, continues Danielou, "was an early example of Muslim ruthlessness, burning in 1018 of the temples of Mathura, razing Kanauj to the ground and destroying the famous temple of Somnath, sacred to all Hindus. His successors were as ruthless as Ghazni: 103 temples in the holy city of Benaras were razed to the ground, its marvelous temples destroyed, its magnificent palaces wrecked." Indeed, the Muslim policy vis a vis India, concludes Danielou, seems to have been a conscious systematic destruction of everything that was beautiful, holy, refined."

(source: Histoire de l' Inde - By Alain Danielou p. 222 or A Brief History of India). For more on Alain Danielou refer to chapter on Quotes. For more on destruction of Hindu temples, refer to Hindu Temples: What Happened to Them : (A Preliminary Survey) - By Arun Shourie and For more refer to Hindu Holocaust Museum

Hindu Kush Mountains - " Slaughter of the Hindus "

Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists have also suffered a terrible holocaust, probably without parallel in human history. Take the Hindu Kush for instance, probably one of the biggest genocides of Hindus. There is practically no serious research ever done about it and no mention in history books. Yet the name Hindu Kush appears many times in the writings of Muslim chroniclers in 1333 AD. Ibn Battutah, the medieval Berber traveller, said the name meant 'Hindu Killer,' a meaning still given by Afghan mountain dwellers. Unlike the Jewish holocaust, the exact toll of the Hindu genocide suggested by the name Hindu Kush is not available. 'However,' writes Hindu Kush specialist Srinandan Vyas, 'the number is easily likely to be in millions.'

Afghanistan was a full part of the Hindu cradle up till the year 1000, and in political unity with India until Nadir Shah separated it in the 18th century. The mountain range in Eastern Afghanistan where the native Hindus were slaughtered, is still called the Hindu Kush (Persian: "Hindu Slaughter").

(Note: To the Hindus, this mountain range was known as Paariyaatra Parvat. But when the last Hindu king of Kabul was killed Muslims ruled this land and then called these mountains the Hindu Kush -- "Slaughter of the Hindus" ).

It is significant that one of the very few place-names on earth that reminds us not of the victory of the winners but rather of the slaughter of the losers, concerns a genocide of Hindus by the Muslims.

A few known historical figures can be used to justify this estimate. The Encyclopaedia Britannica recalls that in December 1398 AD, Taimurlane ordered the execution of at least 50,000 captives before the battle for Delhi; likewise, the number of captives butchered by Taimurlane's army was about 100,000.

The Britannica again mentions that Mughal emperor Akbar ordered the massacre of about 30,000 captured Rajput Hindus on February 24, 1568 AD, after the battle for Chitod, a number confirmed by Abul Fazl, Akbar's court historian. Afghan historian Khondamir notes that during one of the many repeated invasions on the city of Herat in western Afghanistan, which used to be part of the Hindu Shahiya kingdoms '1,500,000 residents perished.' 'Thus, 'it is evident that the mountain range was named as Hindu Kush as a reminder to the future Hindu generations of the slaughter and slavery of Hindus during the Moslem conquests.'

(source: Where's India's holocaust museum? - By Francois Gautier - rediff.com

Answer 2

it is a good question. Muslim fundamantalism is destroying peace and team spirit, killing human beings and doing each little thing which they ought to no longer do. Our human race is split into many elements by using colour, caste, faith, region and this kind of huge volume of different factors. we attempt to reveal superiority over others and it really is what happened whem Muslim rulers destroyed this kind of huge volume of hindu temples. You pass to any old mosque and ask them you'll study that their ancestors had demolished many temples and idols interior those temples were putin the bottom of those mosques and the needed theory is that once human beings walk over them they're genuinely ----------- the deties and followers. Ajmer, Fatahpur Sikri, Nizzamuddin and this kind of huge volume of mosques have those hindu, jain and buddhist idols below them. similar way they demolished many temples and made mosques as an option and Ayodhya is genuinely one of it. Hindus demolished the so said as mosque at Ayodhya and planned to make a temple notwithstanding the than authorities on the centre apologised for the incident and confirmed to the international that we Hindus are scared or may be that our legislators talked about a good chance to attain muslim votes. With those sort of rulers and once you're showing that Hindus at the instantaneous are not united you would possibly want to no longer assume any apologies and keep in recommendations you is purely no longer apologised for what has been finished until eventually eventually you awaken, get united, overlook the caste and faith factors in the hindu community.

Answer 3

yes
its unfair but true
but also there was a Hindu temple on the site before which the Muslims destroyed
what comes around goes around

Answer 4

When the muslim invaded india, they tried to destroy or rebuild temples into mosques, and babri masjid of one of them according to historians - I am a muslim

Answer 5

do u know ancient staue of lord budha was demolished by fantics in AFGHANISTAN,so how can u blameevery AFGHANIS/MUSLIM for that,since fanatism is not any religion,similarly BABRI mosque was defaced by fundamentlists,where HINDU religion does't believe in such things,because he knows that god live with in oneself and one's body is the real temple,where as outside tmples r just symbols,then why to cry for symbols?

Answer 6

That is because the muslims HAD destroyed temples to build mosques when they invaded... that mosque WAS one of them...

Answer 7

Religions are the root cause of most of today's world problems. If you analyse properly you will find that the more religious people are behind all these problems. It is there in every religion.

Answer 8

I think the only reason is that it was a part of the ongoing war against Islam.