What is the definition of 'ART'?

Question

ie Is it just an iderviduals perception?

Answer 1

A long, dry debate. I would say that first, it is a conscious artefact of the human hand, entailing awareness, thought, and skill, and MOST IMPORTANTLY directed to communicate to others emotionally. So, anything from cave-painting to music, but not knitting or jam labels (except as an employed subject). The form of the work, and the aim of the communication, can vary over different times and cultures. But it seems to my own prejudices that art mostly communicates feelings about the human condition, or what contains it. Hence, religious icons, landscape, "still life" as metaphor, and all the rest to Mozart. It seems to me there is a commonality underlying all art, in all forms, and all cultures (e.g. sense of music in paintings; colours and shape in music). But particular cultural forms of art have to be understood from the inside, in their own "language", to which its natural audience is educated simply by living in that culture - e.g. aboriginal art, Persian, Chilean, etc. Because the basic language of all art arises from our shared human nature, we can often respond to an artwork from an alien culture, but rarely to its subtelty as those natural to it would. This can delude people into thinking they understand what they do not. So responding to art demands education, and is far more than an individual's "personal taste" -- but that's where it must begin. What saddens me is that the "education" most people get, from limited exposure, or worse, pop "music" etc. dulls the senses!

Answer 2

I evaluate paintings as with the flexibility to create some thing with skill, not in user-friendly terms whoever concept-approximately it first. Take case in point Andy Warhol. He took a photograph that became already created, blew it up, placed diverse colorings on there and reprinted it hundreds of cases. sure i'm going to offer him the credit of being the 1st man or woman to do this yet how lots expertise rather went into some thing like that? paintings in recent times is obnoxious. persons are growing to be further and extra bizzare the kind to be "diverse" as a replace of growing to be some thing that seems good. i've got heard of a guy putting his semen on a canvas and calling that paintings. Or a woman putting her menstral fluid on a canvas. Is that paintings? No. Is that obtaining her observed? sure yet for the incorrect motives. there are this way of super kind of techniques those so referred to as "artists" attempt and be diverse. the factor is they are forgetting the main extreme piece of changing into an artist, expertise. I merely think of paintings has gotten way out of hand and that any one could be an artist now. My chum's 9 12 months old brother has drawn better than a number of those artists. Throwing paint on a canvas isn't paintings. portray a man or woman and then swinging that man or woman the different way up right into a canvas isn't paintings. status in one spot for a protracted quantity of time without shifting isn't paintings. there are this way of super kind of others it rather is gloomy that we've lost touch of what actual paintings is.

Answer 3

Surely art is a work created by someone, resulting in an emotional response of some kind by the viewer. It doesn't have to be a positive response, or even negative, but the purpose of art should be to challenge the viewer in some way.

Answer 4

Whatever captures the attention and interest of people.

Sometimes trash is passed off as art.

When you see that, it's a reflection of the people.

Art inspires, motivates, moves, and generally tells a story.

Art is ageless. The greater the following, the greater the work.

i.e The Mona Lisa.

Answer 5

Being an artist on various levels & using many types of media, art to me is an expression of my soul, higher self or inner being. One's art is always a self-portrait, even indirectly. Art should make a statement or create a mood/atmosphere. When you exhibit or perform your art, you hope to get some kind of reaction from viewers, whether positive or negative.

Answer 6

Yes, you got it. Although it's also a blend between creativity and skills. You need both to create real art, without creativity you just have a pretty picture, without skills you have those 'artists' who do "radical" art with wierd things like coke bottles or whatever, something anybody could do.

Answer 7

My personal interpretation is that art can be defined by the thought process - somebody sticks a lump of blu-tac on a wall, people cry it's not art. I believe the art behinf it is the artists process of thought to select that piece of blu-tac to become art.

Answer 8

Art is creativity - and if natural - I think comes from a higher plain within. whether it be writing, music, craft, or imagery.
would you like to check my 360 - I recently started to paint because I 'had' to - wanted to all my life. I love it with a passion.

Answer 9

Any craft that perfectly fit your expectations.
Does not apply to arts only.
Think about art of cooking, building, gardening etc.

Answer 10

A visual creative expression; a creative way of expressing moods, thoughts, thinking, feelings .