English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i read a conspiracy theory stating just that. and drug companies paid them off in order to maintain record profits year after year.

2006-06-27 17:11:58 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diseases & Conditions Cancer

15 answers

Thats absolutley true. There are a few cures for cancer, if you look hard you will find them. But the government (nwo) wont release it because cancer keeps the population down and also they make make huge profits of the drugs. Just like aids.

2006-06-27 17:18:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

People love to buy into conspiracy theory and the 'big bad phamacutical company' propagana. But there are several reasons why I don't believe this.

1.) Every cancer is unique. All of these conspiracy theory nuts say we have "three cures for cancer" The same drug that cures breast cancer is not going to cure leukemia. They're a different disease with different types of mutated cells and effects on a person's body and DNA. That's like saying you can cure AIDS with Tuburculosis meds. Have any of these people ever specified a specific type of cancer that has been cured? No, they just say "cancer".

2.) Any drug company that finds a cure for any type of cancer is going to patent that thing quick so that they can be the ones raking in the money. Unless they find a way to stop cancer from ever forming in the first place, it is in their best interest to be the first to come up with a cure and have a monopoly on the market. Why would they wait around for some university lab to find the cure when they can be the ones raking in the money? Makes no sense.

3.) Living patients put more money in their pockets than dead ones. Even a patient that has been declared "cured" will still need different drugs over their lifetime. Anyone that dies of cancer, pretty much stops putting money into drug company pockets. It makes sense to charge a ton of money to cure someone so that they can continue to use various drugs for the next fifty years, than to charge the same amount for treatments and have them die.

2006-06-28 18:23:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't believe everything you read on the net. Cured is defined as being cancer free for five years. Did you know that many cancers are particularly unique to the individual? That some treatments work on some people but not others for the same type of cancer? Did you know that the best research out there is making designer cancer drugs that are developed partly from one's own body? Cancer is probably here for some time to come. You want conspiracy theories? Look into ADHD and allergy drugs. That's the real racket.

2006-06-28 00:18:39 · answer #3 · answered by Iamstitch2U 6 · 0 0

yes, one cure is through the use of sonic lazers. just like someone breaking a glass with their singing voice. every cell in the human body has a combustion frequency. Likewise the frequency for a diseased cell combusts at a different freq. than a healthy one. through the use of a sonic lazer device, cancerous cells have been targeted and erraticated. When the AMA found out about this, they put an end to it.
With out disease, they would not have money.

2006-06-29 17:28:09 · answer #4 · answered by SpookyMulder 2 · 0 0

I don't think its true, because if they had cured cancer it would have been all over the news by now, and people in top universities and stuff wouldn't still be trying different things to find the cure

2006-06-28 00:18:06 · answer #5 · answered by feusha 3 · 0 0

The FIRST company to find a cure is gonna RAKE in the dough. They will have the complete MONOPOLY on the patent to cure this entire nation of sick people. They aren't keeping it a secret.....what kinda crap do you read??

2006-06-28 05:17:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm sure that's true...do you have any idea how many billions of dollars the pharmaceutical companies would lose if they announced a cure for cancer ?????!!!!!

2006-06-28 00:15:04 · answer #7 · answered by Campbell Gramma 5 · 0 0

yes but it still depends upon the severity of the cancer whether it will be cured or not.. and the treatment for cancer has several adverse and side effects

2006-06-28 00:20:25 · answer #8 · answered by blossom 1 · 0 0

yes i believe there have been many cures for 'incureable' diseases and that drug companies paid pple to keep them silent. i mean seriously, drug companies are making millions of us idiots!

2006-06-28 00:16:22 · answer #9 · answered by buttheadhatesyou 1 · 0 0

I'm aware of a skin cancer natural remedy, thats all... It has worked on me!

2006-06-28 00:15:00 · answer #10 · answered by microsvc 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers