Do you think 911 happend because we put anothe "Bush" in office?

Answer 1

Yes do you think there was a better way of getting public support without an incident in this country? He was feeding of the country's rage and sadness to manipulate the situation to get back over there. There are roomers that there was a notice on his desk about that 2 days prior to the 9/11 incident yet nothing was done. Things that make you go hum-mm.

Answer 2

911 happened because it was planned by the CIA and their leaders, the Illuminati.

The Illuminati has different presidents put in office to fulfill what they want done at a particular time to further their agenda of bringing the entire world into a single government. The vote of the people really makes no difference because they pull the strings that operate the polls.

To see what really happened on 911 may I refer you to two different sites on the Internet.

www.letsroll911.org

Watch the video when this site comes up...watch it all then decide who did 911. I dare you!

Sorry but Randy has bought into the lies of the USA his answer is typical who still believe that the USA was attacked by foreign terrorist...the attacks came from within...Randy I challenge you to read and listen to the site I listed below.

http://www.apfn.org/apfn.htm

Answer 3

First of all it's 9/11 or September 11th. Either is acceptable.
Secondly, I think to say that the terrorists were waiting until Bush was elected is preposterous. Ridiculous even.
The terrorists were taking flight lessons while Clinton was in office. NOBODY knew that Bush was going to be president. All the planning that took place. All the other attacks that took place. None of that had anything to do with who is in the oval office.
To think otherwise is just a mental convenience to people who dislike Bush and/or his policies and are just looking for something else to blame on him.

Answer 4

The level of misstatements, uncorroborated assertions, out and out political spin, and acceptance of propaganda, is astounding. Civilians of the United States were attack on United States soil. The attack was perpetrated by international terrorists using extreme Islamic fundamentalism as cover and following a pattern of such attacks. This was only on battle in a war which has existed for more than 1,000 years. United States’ politicians were not part of this attack in any form or degree.

This war has taken on a structure quite different than has been fought before the United States. There is no front line and the terrorists attack civilians by intent. Our country (including the military) is learning to fight such a war. While our military uses restraint, it is difficult when terrorists use civilians (including women and children) to hide. For those who don’t believe that restrain is used, it would be oh so very easy to end this by turning parts of the world to glass (say the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan) and the problem would disappear. However, the United States restrains itself from doing such a thing. It even does what most other countries won’t do, for those U.S. Soldiers who are suspected of doing something wrong they are charged, go to trial, and if convicted they receive punishment.

Even so, there are those who seemingly cannot wait to make the most unfounded allegations about those who are Constitutionally responsible to defend the country against these terrorists. Does this mean that we shouldn’t be concerned about what our elected leaders do or how they performed their jobs, of course not. However, we should use verifiable facts.

Answer 5

I doubt 9/11 happened just because we put another Bush in office. That would be coincidence. Not to mention the Iraq people and the Taliban Al Qaida etc. have had it out for us with or without a Bush in office.

Answer 6

Bush knew 911 was coming he laughed and he did dealing with the wrong group of terrorists ! are USA let these terrorists in and trained them to fly? and they had false Ids and and identity um mm like the Mexicans i would use here for an example only !

Answer 7

Sept 11th happened because Republicans failed to protect Americans. That is truth. Bu$h was given a PDB that told him we were going to be attacked, How they would do it, he ignored it.
It is not true that Clinton was offered Bin Laden, that is a lie.
Clinton tried to kill Bin laden and missed, he fired a hellfire missile from a drone plane. BTW, no President is legally permitted to order the assignation of anyone.
had Bu$h went after Bin Laden instead of spending $2 trillion in Iraq to get Saddam, bin Laden would not still be free.
Republicans love to lie and they use lies to shift blame.
Randy, It is fact that Bu$h was given a PDB, It is fact that 17 of the 19 hi jackers were Saudis, it is also fact that Bush approved a flight out of the USA for Bin Ladens family, friends of the Bu$h family. Randy your still very confused as to what is fact. Randy said this "However, we should use verifiable facts." Randy,This is your homework for today, you verify the facts and drop the fiction you permote.

Answer 8

I think 9-11 would have happened, regardless of who was in office...

but I feel that how it has been handled since is ridiculous... spending much more time, resources and money on the nation that didn't attack us than we are on the organization that did attack us... I believe I would feel much safer if we had bin Laden than if we had Saddam... and if we sent as many people after bin Laden as we did Saddam, we would have probably found him...

Answer 9

Each day on Yahoo Answers I am shocked to find out that there are so many uneducated, misled people in this country, I can only hope the majority of the people who post on here are the people who don't vote.

For God's sake, or if your atheist, for "whatever it is you believe ins" sake, take it upon yourself to find out what the hell is going on in the world!

Answer 10

FIRST LETS GET ONE THING RIGHT, IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 911, WHICH A LOT OF PEOPLE THINK THEY DID ,ONLY BECAUSE THE 2- AS$HOLES IN WASHINGTON SAID SO. AND THATS WHY WE ARE AT WAR .