define miller theorem.?

Answer 1

A financial theory stating that the market value of a firm is determined by its earning power and the risk of its underlying assets, and is independent of the way it chooses to finance its investments or distribute dividends. Remember, a firm can choose between three methods of financing: issuing shares, borrowing or spending profits (as opposed to dispersing them to shareholders in dividends). The theorem gets much more complicated, but the basic idea is that, under certain assumptions, it makes no difference whether a firm finances itself with debt or equity.

Answer 2

Modigliani-Miller theorem
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Modigliani-Miller theorem (of Franco Modigliani, Merton Miller) forms the basis for modern thinking on capital structure. The basic theorem states that, in the absence of taxes, bankruptcy costs, and asymmetric information, and in an efficient market, the value of a firm is unaffected by how that firm is financed. It does not matter if the firm's capital is raised by issuing stock or selling debt. It does not matter what the firm's dividend policy is. The theorem is made up of two propositions which can also be extended to a situation with taxes.

[edit]
Propositions Modigliani-Miller theorem (1958) (without taxes):
Consider two firms which are identical except for their financial structures. The first (Firm U) is unleveraged: that is, it is financed by equity only. The other (Firm L) is leveraged: it is financed partly by equity, and partly by debt. The Modigliani-Miller theorem states that the value the two firms is the same:

Proposition I:

where VU is the value of an unleveraged firm = price of buying all the firm's equity, and VL is the value of a levered firm = price of buying all the firm's equity, plus all its debt.

To see why this should be true, suppose an investor is considering buying one of the two firms U or L. Instead of purchasing the shares of the leveraged firm L, he could purchase the shares of firm U and borrow the same amount of money B that firm L does. The eventual returns to either of these investments would be the same. Therefore the price of L must be the same as the price of U minus the money borrowed B, which is the value of L's debt.

This discussion also clarifies the role of some of the theorem's assumptions. We have implicitly assumed that the capitalist's cost of borrowing money is the same as that of the firm, which need not be true under asymmetric information or in the absence of efficient markets.

Proposition II:

rS is the cost of equity.

r0 is the cost of capital for an all equity firm.

rB is the cost of debt.

B / S is the debt-to-equity ratio.

This proposition states that the cost of equity is a linear function of the firm´s debt to equity ratio. A higher debt-to-equity ratio leads to a higher required return on equity, because of the higher risk involved for equity-holders in a company with debt. The formula is derived from the theory of weighted average cost of capital.

These propositions are true assuming:

-no taxes exist.

-no transaction costs exist.

-individuals and corporations borrow at the same rates.

These results might seem irrelevant (after all, none of the conditions are met in the real world), but the theorem is still taught and studied because it tells us something very important. That is, if capital structure matters, it is precisely because one or more of the assumptions is violated. It tells us where to look for determinants of optimal capital structure and how those factors might affect optimal capital structure.

[edit]
Propositions Modigliani-Miller theorem (1963) (with taxes)
Proposition I:

VL is the value of a levered firm.

VU is the value of an unlevered firm.

TCB is the tax rate(T_C) x the value of debt (B)

This means that there are advantages for firms to be levered, since corporations can deduct interest payments. Therefore leverage lowers tax payments. Dividend payments are non-deductible.

Proposition II:

rS is the cost of equity.

r0 is the cost of capital for an all equity firm.

rB is the cost of debt.

B / S is the debt-to-equity ratio.

Tc is the tax rate.

The same relationship as earlier described stating that the cost of equity rises with leverage, because the risk to equity rises, still holds. The formula however has implications for the difference with the WACC.

Assumptions made in the propositions with taxes are:

-Corporations are taxed at the rate T_C, on earnings after interest.

-No transaction cost exist

-Individuals and corporations borrow at the same rate

Miller and Modigliani published a number of follow-up papers discussing some of these issues.

The theorem first appeared in: F. Modigliani and M. Miller, "The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment," American Economic Review (June 1958).

Answer 3

Miller's Theorem in electronics (I assume this is the Miller's theorem you are looking for since this was in the Engineering section), is a circuit analysis technique for substituting an impedance Z with node voltages V1 and V2 on each side of it by two impedances to ground with the same node voltages applied to these two impedances. The impedance for node V1 to ground is Z/(1-K) where K = V2/V1. The impedance for node V2 to ground is ZK/(K-1).

Answer 4

Yeah, what they said.