English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is technically a scar so did they have belly buttons?

2006-06-27 11:13:51 · 28 answers · asked by bjdmb 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I knwo they were human...not a bright answer. They weren't born from a womb. They didn't need to be attached to an umbilical cord so did they ever have a bellybutton? The bellybutton is just a scar from the umbilical cord.

2006-06-27 11:17:26 · update #1

28 answers

probably not. belly buttons are where the placentas connect to the embryo, since they weren't born, they were created i don't see why they would.

2006-06-27 11:17:38 · answer #1 · answered by naclayclay 2 · 3 4

Good question.

As you say this technically is the "scar" from the umbilical cord, since they were created and not born they would not have had a navel or belly button.

To directly answer your question, no.

2006-06-27 18:20:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a valid question. Supposedly they were "created" by God so why would they have belly buttons? Belly buttons are left by cutting the umbilibcal chord, which Adam and Eve shouldn't have had since they were not born of a human.

2006-06-27 18:18:56 · answer #3 · answered by sunflowers 4 · 0 0

no as they did not come from the womb. Technically,

they are the first clones of my angels. Adam was easy to make however Eve proved to be quite alluring in design. But no neither would have had the tube needed to feed as neither came from a womb

2006-06-27 18:17:50 · answer #4 · answered by St Guido 4 · 0 0

Excellent - now we get to the biology of the thing.

I think the only scar was on one side of Adam's Ribs.

I'm still laughing....thanks!

2006-06-27 18:18:40 · answer #5 · answered by Finnegan 7 · 0 0

Well, Eve was created from Adams rib so no birth of either party is discussed. No birth, no unmbilical cord, i.e. no belly button. My guess.........

2006-06-27 18:17:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow... Dude, I never thought about that... I guess they wouldn't, since they wouldn't have had umbilical cords...

...Maybe they're umbilical cords stretched up to heaven?

Great question! :)

2006-06-27 18:17:55 · answer #7 · answered by Joka 3 · 0 0

I never read in the Bible about this, so I can't really say for certain if they had belly buttons or not. I do have to admit that you are a real thinker!!!

2006-06-27 18:17:45 · answer #8 · answered by southernlisa37 3 · 0 0

you are discussing a subject that was recorded from century's of hear say. no books were written there so it was the tales handed down. Go to the Witnessed Books of the New Testament.

2006-06-27 18:17:46 · answer #9 · answered by kritikos43 5 · 0 0

Of course not. Why would they have bellybuttons? Yet another reason not to believe the Bible. It just doesn't make sense.

2006-06-27 18:17:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nobody knows because God made them wear clothes made out of fig leaves. They had to be careful when the animals got hungry though. Yeeouch.

2006-06-27 18:17:16 · answer #11 · answered by eschaton 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers