2006-06-27 08:54:13 · 8 answers · asked by Bush Philosopher 2 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
The advantages and disadvantages depend on who is using the camera and what is more important to them.
A D-SLR is generally more technically capable of taking better pictures in difficult situations. It does better in low light at higher ISO sensitivity. It has a larger sensor and lens, and can achieve more artistic photographs. It has more manual controls and flexibility. It usually has more mega-pixels, so you can make bigger enlargements.
But, D-SLR's
. are more expensive, and require expensive add-on lenses and attachments for flash, etc.
. are less convenient because they are bigger, and you have to carry around all the lenses and other attachments
. are less flexible in dynamic settings because you have to take time to change lenses and settings
. require more photographic education to take advantage of the greater capabilities
. are heavier to carry on vacation days
. do not support video clips with sound
So the camera buyer has to decide: Are the better technical capabilities of a D-SLR worth the higher cost and other disadvantages? Yes, they are to lots of people for lots of different reasons.
However, now there are "SLR-like" cameras such as the Canon S3 IS, Sony H5, and Panasonic FZ30. These are getting closer to SLR capability, are much easier to carry around, and cost lots less. You cannot change the lens, but the 12x zoom covers a lot of territory between wide-angle and telephoto.
Each type of camera has its own advantages. It's up to you to decide what's more important for you.
2006-06-27 10:31:06 · answer #1 · answered by fredshelp 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
An SLR will offer the following advantages:
1) Multiple lenses for multiple purposes.
2) Faster shutter speeds for fast action.
3) Less shutter lag. The time between clicking the shutter release and actually taking the picture is generally non-existent on a D-SLR
4) Faster refresh time. If you're taking pictures of something in-action, you can take multiple frames per second with a D-SLR. Not an option with your average point-and-shoot.
5) Generally more options.
Digital SLRs *are* more expensive, from the body, to the lenses, to the accessories, but also are much more powerful.
2006-06-27 14:25:28 · answer #2 · answered by David B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have found that the best Single Lens Reflex cameras are the 35mm ones. Which is to say, if you want a SLR camera you should go with film not digital... I guess that doesn't really answer your question but I hope it helps.
2006-06-27 08:59:57 · answer #3 · answered by Andrew 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can change out the lens on an SLR (ultra zoom, wide angle, fish eye). You can use filters on an SLR. To me, this makes it more creatively friendly.
2006-06-27 08:58:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The main reason to get a SLR is to gain the ability to change lenses. To get access to true wide-angle (28mm and below), telephoto (200mm and up) , macro lenses.
2006-06-27 12:44:59 · answer #5 · answered by A4Q 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
SLR camera's are better than any point and shoot
2006-06-28 06:25:57 · answer #6 · answered by cjsqueaky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lord Litchfield who was a distinguished photographer, since deceased, moved from film to digital because of its superior advantages.I think this sums it up.
2006-06-27 09:05:29 · answer #7 · answered by xenon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply Put ANY SLR is better than ANY POINT & SHOOT......
2006-06-27 09:42:52 · answer #8 · answered by JAMES E. F 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋