For giving them the right to have one. Against myself doing it.
2006-06-27 08:49:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against
2006-06-27 09:35:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against
2006-06-27 08:50:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by trace 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against
2006-06-27 08:50:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steelers 6 Penguins 3 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against
2006-06-27 08:49:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by professionaleccentric 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against, as is a solid majority of the US population -- not to mention the 45 out of 50 states with laws specifically defining marriage as a man-woman union.
2006-06-27 08:51:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely, positively, 100% FOR!!!!
Who are we to deny homosexuals the right heterosexuals have had since (roughly) the dawn of time? Who are we to play God & say "you can only marry a person of the opposite sex"? We're doing the same thing we did in the 1950s & before (segregation, Jim Crow laws, etc.) & it's not fair to anyone.
2006-06-27 08:58:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by SingingStar7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
marriage? against.
Same sex couples? sure, why not.
When someone is married, there is a lot more...options. for example, adopting/having a child. Imagine the difficulty the child will have when he/she starts to attend school, especially in the society we live in. There are just so many more implications in marriage.
2006-06-27 09:03:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by curious 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
against
2006-06-27 08:57:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by amatullah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
against
2006-06-27 08:49:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by B & W 2
·
0⤊
0⤋