I have my very own set of beliefs which don't seem to coincide with any known religion. I was raised presbyterian, but since doing some research, I have come to learn that I spent my life thinking the sabbath was Sunday, and its not. And no, it was not changed to Sunday by any of the diciples, they celebrated the sabbath on the same day Christ did, Friday sundown to Saturday sundown. Constantine changed it to try to lure the pagans to christianity, because Sunday was the day they worshipped their false idols and he figured it would be easier to convert them with a Sunday sabbath. To me, this is in direct contrast to "honor the sabbath and keep it holy", changing it is not honoring it. I still attend church on Sunday, because that's when its held, just observe the sabbath on Saturday.
I do know I couldn't be catholic, Jesus told us to pray to God, not to Him, not to anyone else, so the concept of praying to man-made saints for intervention would be wrong to me. Would never pray to Mary, or any "saint". I also have a problem wth the church "making" someone a saint. Does God go by the pope's decision as to who's a saint? I don't think so. What the pope, or any other human thinks is totally irrelevant to Him, sainthood is His decision, not ours. Course, there are those that I would imagine would have to be saints, like Mother Teresa, but just because I say so or the pope says so means zilch.
I also have a problem with crucifixes. I wear a cross, but there's a line between putting the figure of Christ on that cross, that would come under the "graven images" heading I think, so like I said, catholic isn't the church for me. Baptist isn't the church for me either, because they basically suck the fun right out of life, especially the fundies. I think God wanted us to enjoy life a bit, or He wouldn't have put us here. Also, they're very judgmental, which is in contrast to the fact that Jesus will be the judge at the time of judgment, no one else has the right to judge anyone, or to say that someone else is or isn't going to heaven. That's just wrong on too many levels for me to deal with. He will judge by their hearts, and none of us can do that, so just leave the judging to Him. Oh, and that speaking in tongues thing, please! Speaking in tongues in the bible was speaking a foreign language, not gibberish. I can't even imagine sitting in church listening to people spout gibberish without breaking out in laughter. Why some of these churches don't tell their congregations that gibberish is not speaking in tongue is beyond me.
I could go on and on, but you get my drift. I guess I'm just a cronic outsider, and that's okay too. So yeah, I'm my own little denomination of one, and it works just fine.
2006-06-27 08:55:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A nondenominational church does not support any particular doctrine or theology. They focus more on the Bible and your own relationship with God. Catholocism teaches that you must confess your sins to a priest to have them forgiven, whereas a nondenominational church believes you should condess your sins straight to God. Attend the services of a few different churches and talk to its members, and that should give you a pretty good idea of what they are about. God Bless.
2006-06-27 08:40:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by zippo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a desire to go back to a time when our labels or deniminations did not divide us as Christians. I was raised in a church that followed the Bible as they understood it and called themselves Christians only but were very close to the Apostolic Oneness (concurrent modalistic monarchians)Pentecostals in the practice of thier faith. They believe 1)repentance, turning from sin 1John 3:4, 2) baptism by immersion in water in the name of Jesus Christ/Yahushua the Messiah and 3)the infilling of the Holy Ghost/Spirit with the initial sign of speaking in tongues/languages as the Spirit of Yah/Godor Lord gave them the utterance (not through education) made anyone a Christian, nothing more or less.
Acts of the Apostles chapter 2 is the central tenent of thier faith with the plan of salvation making one a Christian found in verses 38-39 of this same chapter. To them this is what the Bible required for one to be a follower of the Messiah and the Apostles he appointed. This is the very foundation of true faith, thus they did not see themselves as being a part of a denomination but as born again Christians or simply members of the Body of Christ. They do not consider themselves Protestants or Catholics simply Christians.
The Holy Spirit would instruct one through the Scriptures of the 66 books of the Bible on how to continue to live a holy life after becoming a Christian. They use the King James Version of the Bible but also use other translations to study and get a clearer meaning of the original text along with a Strong's Concordanceand Dictionaries.
Today they still exist in this belief as the Ozark Christian Fellowship, 257 CR 274, Mountain Home Arkansas, meeting on Wednesday at 7:30 p.m., beginning of the Sabbath, Friday 7:00 p.m. for prayer, and 2:00 p.m. Sabbath or Saturday afternoon. They welcome all people to their meetings.
2006-06-27 08:54:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by echadone 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nondenominational - Not restricted to or associated with a religious denomination.
I belong to a church that, although it is organized and we do have an order of our services, teaches strictly out of the Bible. We are free to use whatever translation is easiest for us to understand because we examine the Bible line by line precept by precept in order to understand what it means.
There are several popular versions at our church: King James Version, New King James Version, New American Standard, New International version (my choice), the Amplified Bible (used by many pastors), the Message Bible, and on and on. Our pastors actually use all of the Bibles listed above and others not mentioned, simply to get a larger view of what something might mean and how to teach it to the church members.
My pastors have it right: They teach the way their membership needs to learn in order to accept the Lord as their savior and do their human best to walk in His Way and find out what to do in the difficult times.
2006-06-27 08:42:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sandy S 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i remember on case you replaced the be conscious "conception" with the synonymous be conscious "hypothesis" you'll not have a topic. until eventually you're thoroughly unthinking, this is no longer accessible to no longer already have a preconceived concepts about what you're going to study. there is no longer something incorrect with already having beliefs, you won't be able to no longer have them... in any case because the end results of studying you study in case you've been both proper, incorrect, or fairly both on your beliefs. enable's take something straight forward as an party. The Earth strikes around the daylight. My Preconceived hypothesis: From journey i am going to observe the daylight flow by the sky. The Earth feels like this is incredibly nevertheless. so that you'll in straight forward words finish that the daylight is the man who's genuinely transferring. ^The above is notwithstanding incorrect. The argument hostile to the above is that once you do the mathematics this is plenty less difficult for the Earth and planets to be circling the daylight and not in any respect each little thing circling the Earth. also we may be able to study Venus and be conscious how the darkish fringe of Venus alterations (see as Venus is going around the daylight diverse elements of it are lit up showing that this is transferring around the daylight). And why it feels like the Earth isn't transferring is defined because we are in reality "transferring with" the Earth. ===== As a part be conscious I disagree with the man who stated "beliefs have a tendency to get contained in the way". this is no longer real, in reality, maximum clinical information are genuinely "beliefs" earlier they're shown. you've a conception, you pass out and teach that conception. Copernicus believed the Heliocentric sort, he went out and proved it.
2016-11-29 20:18:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I consider myself Nondenomination, My doctorian is the RED LETTERS, in other words if Jesus said it, then it is Gospel.
Anything else I let other people argue over.
God Bless
Dead Man Walking
2006-06-27 08:36:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dead Man Walking 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nondenomination means not part of a denomimantion.Indepenent.
2006-06-27 08:34:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by robert p 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Those who attend non-denominational churches are generally protestant. They vary widely in their individual beliefs. However if you ask an individual they will probably be able to give you some denomination that their beliefs closely mirror although they'll tell you they disagree on some aspects. There are churches that are similar to baptists, pentacostals, methodists, etc.
2006-06-27 08:34:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by luckyme 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm sure you can find more info on the web and by getting in touch with local non-denomination churches... but:
a non-denominational church accepts the beliefs more of less of everyone. they do not preach of hell or the afterlife; as in eternal damnation. anyone can attend this church and feel "at ease." It's teachings include kindness and tolerance and goodness.
2006-06-27 08:34:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by amber 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually fundamentalist in disguise.
1. Nicean Council three Gods
2. Faith alone in there too.
3. Hates a church that talks of works.
2006-06-27 08:32:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋