English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

all says that we cant live without money & nature. all would say its nature but steel we avoid nature 4 money.why is it so?????.who will give me xact answer will deserve 10 pts.

2006-06-27 08:16:08 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Family

33 answers

Nature is superior. Think about all the natural destruction (Hurricane Katrina). No amount of money can stop nature from it's normal course.

2006-07-10 00:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by mom of girls 6 · 1 0

Nature

2006-07-05 02:16:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Man's ability to devolope his own surroundings would initially say that money is more powerful. But when we look at those people who have so much more money than the average joe, what do they do with that money? They take trips to exotic lands, and buy massive yachts to sail the seven seas. They take their money directly back into nature. Aesthetically nature is more powerful. Man has created a world where money is a necessity to return to nature and so there is the illusion that money is more powerful. You can't build a life in a neighbors back woods, that's squatting, and you'll be arrested. But if you can buy those back woods then you've got something. Thats why land value has skyrocketed. Man strives at some level to return back to nature. Now if you're talking pure unadulterated strength, then obviously nature is stronger. We've seen that from Hurricane Katrina and numerous other accounts. But the heart of man is stronger than nature.

2006-06-27 08:30:36 · answer #3 · answered by concedoafortuna 1 · 0 0

i don't quite understand what u mean by nature in this question. Without nature we simply wouldn't be able to live, or if we do, we'd literally be like prisoners surrounded by four walls. No wonder why they call it prison! (don't forget that we need nature to construct those walls, and we need to cut down trees to make the paper money, and we need to mine our nature to make the coins)

Assumption#1: nature = trees, mountains, glaciers, rivers, grass, farmland, seas, oceans, sun, moon, sunset, breeze, crops, plants, flowers, birds, love, animals, love, sex (that is natural aint it)

If assumption #1 is true, then what good is the money. People want money believing it can buy wealth of stuff that would lead us to happiness. Money can buy us fancy cars, grandiose houses with oh so beautiful gardens, good-looking woman (or a sexy gentleman), exotic vacations, and good schools for the kids. But will all those make us happy? I don't think so. I think sitting on a beach watching the sunset on a nice breezy evening together with your love is priceless. Holding your first born is priceless. Watching ur baby take the first steps. Sleeping under the moonlight and the stars. Petting ur pet. the soul-southing satisfaction of eating a cold watermelon during the unbearable summer heat. Watching Zidaine butthead some Italian dude.

Last I heard, money can't buy u these things. Heck, in the good old old ages, people didn't use money, they just bartered. Today we can't live without money if we want to buy all those gizmos that we c other people having. What do these gizmos do for us, oh they just occupy our time instead of trying to figure out who we are and what is it that we want to do.

Besides, how does it feel to be in control of things, to be able to decide the fate of who will get those 10 points of your vote. Feels good that you can decide something, eh? Ain't that something money can't buy?

2006-07-10 05:49:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nature of course. Without it we wouldn't be able to build on land, take cruises, go hunting or fishing, visit national parks and the like. If we didn't have nature be the superior one than how would money matter. No one would make money.

2006-07-05 01:13:12 · answer #5 · answered by Deb 4 · 0 0

the two things are different. they are given by preference as per their need. finally need will be the deciding factor. see, we can't say simply nature it self is superior. As we have controlled by money ( it is true), some times it is happens that money will be seemed to be more superior. but at the same time, we can't live by ignoring the balance of the nature. as it is give the survival. in my view, there must be a balance between the two.

finally my child, let me stop by saying your question is unanswerable.

2006-06-30 07:14:00 · answer #6 · answered by hari kishore m 1 · 0 0

Nature off course :-)

We can't live without nature. We have lived without money. You don't need money to grow stuff and to hunt, or to look for fruits.

Without nature... what would you eat? What air would you breath if there are no trees to clean up the air? What water would you drink? From what material would we make everything?
You can't make anything without natural ingredients!
What do you think money is made from?
Where else should our material come from? Outer space? And even that is nature.
:-)

Everything on this whole Earth is nature or created by us using nature. From air to fuel to iron to water to food. Off course we can't live without.

2006-06-27 08:22:15 · answer #7 · answered by Bloed 6 · 0 0

People exploit nature for money, but mother earth will live on and we are destroying ourselves, are we the next dinosaurs?Afterall, "We did not weave the web of life but are merely strands in it. " Mother nature is all powerful.

If the sh*t hit the fan and we had to do without gas and electricity, we would all go back to the bartering system and money would be worthless except to make a fire.

2006-07-10 18:47:25 · answer #8 · answered by PeaceTree 3 · 0 0

nature is superior. If you cleaned the slate, completely clean of money then nature could bring you more money. If you wiped the slate clean of nature, no amount of money would ever bring nature back. You cant buy breeds of animals or trees once they're gone.

2006-07-10 06:19:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course nature

2006-06-27 18:47:07 · answer #10 · answered by Bikay 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers