English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Sadaam was caught
Al Zarqawi is dead
Iraq have a new president

2006-06-27 07:56:45 · 12 answers · asked by Honest Abe 2 in Politics & Government Military

Saddam was caught
Al Zaqari is dead
Iraq has a new president
I'm not questioning why american soldiers went to Iraq. I want to know what they still have to do there.

2006-06-28 07:09:57 · update #1

12 answers

Good question! Twin Towers (Saddam WAS linked to these MURDERS of innocent people when they discovered Al Quida training camps in Iraq near the Iranian borders); how many violations of the UN resolutions? So many I can't remember, but more then 12 that I know of; reports of WMD's, which whether you believe it or not, that had to be answered by force since the UN is a gutless piece of work, so corrupt that the French and Russians were making millions off the humane efforts of the United States who nearly funded all the monies for the "Food Program". Of course these funds were never used by Saddam to feed his people, he was to busy killling them by the hundreds of thousands while French politicians were getting millions. Hello, anyone home yet! Crimes of humanity not unlike Hitler. Remember him..and you know what, Hitler never bombed the US but we still took him out. Does anyone ever ask WHY? Oh ya, the Palestinians and the President of Iran and Saddam. Hitler was their HERO...but he was an infidel too...go figure. Guess it comes down to madness. Even Saddam's generals thought he had WMD's because that is what Saddam wanted everyone to believe. Well, he got his wish...we believed him. I Wish he had died in that hole but my wish didnt come true.Women raped, children killed, wifes ravaged in front of their families for the pleasures of sons of Saddam, mass burials of innocent Iraqis who did not like their President (what a joke, president); using WMD to kill 300,000 Kurds; These are some of the reasons we are in IRAQ and if the damn politicians would let the military act like the military then this war would be over. If we entered WWII like this, we would be speaking German or Japanese. Truman was right, the US should never enter a war without using all it's might and power to defeat the enermy in a short, unrelenting manner and then return home. Unfortunately we have a bunch of weak politicians in office and a nation of sheep that follow their good shepards right into the gates of hell. Wake up America, the world is not what it used to be and Muslims want us all dead. Got it now.

2006-06-27 11:56:51 · answer #1 · answered by maverick 1 · 1 2

Why do you are saying our troops are killing blameless men and women? I have not begun to listen to something approximately an American Soldier strapping explosives to his frame and blowing up a marketplace stuffed with Iraqi men and women... It is MUSLIMS doing that, and American Soldiers treating the wounded and serving to blank up after wards. I understand there were errors made and a few innocents killed by way of our troops, however MUSLIMS kill extra blameless sufferers with one or 2 bombs than we now have killed in 4 years of combating. I might choose if we simply pulled out and left them to kill each and every different if that's what they wish to do... and it's what they're going to do, historical past repeats... mainly relating to devout feuds. I am sorry we interfered within the genocide Saddam had deliberate for the Kurds after which the Shiites after that, possibly it might were higher to permit that maintain. EDIT: I consider Muslims were their possess worse enemy within the US given that nine-eleven occurred. If Muslims had stood up early and denounced what occurred it could have seemed honest rather of self serving. Instead they waited and whilst there used to be a backlash of public sentiment towards Muslims... they ultimately stood up and denounced the violence, however by way of that point it appeared to be a response to the backlash.

2016-08-31 15:28:23 · answer #2 · answered by mcilwain 4 · 0 0

I am going to answer a question with a question. Why not? We lost over 2,000 Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen over there. Pulling out would just pretty much say "The he!! with the guys who died over there" Also, because of the SOB's who beheaded our 2 Soldiers.

2006-06-27 09:14:39 · answer #3 · answered by Jenny 1 · 0 0

Also, because if we pulled out gas prices would go sky high and can cause an economic crash. Also the girl (jenny) who answered about the 2,000 soldiers lost is a good answer.

2006-06-27 10:02:34 · answer #4 · answered by danvil11 2 · 0 0

Because they need a bronze finish, or maybe because Iraq it´s in civil war and we still need oil, and Halliburton a few extra billions bucks.

2006-06-27 11:21:52 · answer #5 · answered by rod 2 · 0 0

Because that's where they're needed, pure and simple. I'm sure glad you people weren't around when we needed real people with guts to gain our Independence.

2006-06-27 08:13:15 · answer #6 · answered by oldman 7 · 0 0

Because Bush got us in there, and now there is no way to get us out.

2006-06-27 10:04:22 · answer #7 · answered by Kimmy <3 5 · 0 0

Excellent Question !
It's about time the U.S. stop playing "Enforcer", and let the
Iraqi's play hockey !

2006-06-27 08:05:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So people like you can have the freedom to ask questions like this.

2006-06-27 09:14:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because our president doesn't want to admit that there's nothing else we can do there

2006-06-27 08:02:52 · answer #10 · answered by tarotfaery 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers