Evolution? Lies?

Question

“Humanity has paid a steep, gruesome price for the awful experiments in deliberate antitheism carried out by Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Maro Tse-tung and others – each of whom was profoundly influenced by the writing of the apostles of atheism. After watching atheism proliferate… it’s clearer than ever that… without God, we’re lost.” –Luis Palau


http://www.leestrobel.com/videos/Christ/strobelT1067.htm

There is a lack of convincing evidence to back up Darwin’s claim that there is a common origin of all life. There is micro-evolution, which is just a variation between different kinds of animals… But in the last 150 years science has failed to substantiate Darwin’s claims of macro-evolution which is that all creatures have a common ancestor and that natural selection acting on random variation can explain how fish became amphibians, which became reptiles, which became birds and mammals and so forth… INSTEAD the fossil records indisputably show that the majority, if not all of the

of the worlds 40 highest category in the animal kingdom… virtually sprang forth with unique new body plans fully formed and without transitionary fossils preceding them. Darwin new that his theory was a problem… he said “future discoveries will bear out my theory” but they haven’t. It’s not a faith versus science issue. It’s a science versus science issue. There is more evidence for the existence of a creator….
Cosmology-study of the origin of the universe…. Scientists thought that the earth had always existed. But thanks to dramatic new evidence that has been uncovered in just the past few decades virtually all scientists are now convinced that the universe had a sudden beginning in a giant explosion of light.
Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
The universe began to exist.
Therefore, the universe has a cause.

Cosmologists now know that the universe began in an explosion of photons. (Light) The Bible says in Genesis 1:3 “God said, let there be light, and there was light”
Who created God then? No one did. The argument isn’t that whatever exists has a cause. The argument is whatever BEGINS to exist has a cause. And God, by definition, is eternal. He never BEGAN to exist, he always has existed. Atheists shouldn’t have a problem believing that God is eternal because for centuries they have believe that the universe was eternal. So how could God not be?

“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” – Charles Darwin.

All of the parts have to be present and fully functioning in order for them to work. The bacterial flagellum, some bacteria have little tales on them. This bacteria needs 30-35 proteins are needed to make a functional flagellum. Darwinism doesn’t leave room for this to occur.

“My conclusion can be summed up in a single word: design. I say that based on science. I believe that irreducibly complex systems are strong evidence of a purposeful, intentional design by an intelligent agent.” –Biochemist Michael Behe

“Only a rookie who knows nothing about science would say science takes away from faith. If you really study science, it will bring you closer to God.” –Nanoscientist James Tour of Rice University

Again... no arguments here... NEXT!

No one seems to read fully... Except for the Christians.
Ironic... isn't it??

Answer 1

Hats off to you! You have made very good, logical arguments for creation. The more I learn about the universe, its orderliness and all its wonders, the more I have to believe that a super being is responsible for it.
Unfortunately, most athiests will never change their minds, no matter how logical your arguments are.

Answer 2

You live a very sheltered life. You seem to have read every book out there supporting god. But remember there are two sides to the argument, if you know about the other side of the argument, you would not have said the things you did. What about the problems with the bible, it has more gaps than evolution.Yes many have been killed by those that did not believe in god. OK, ever hear of a crusade...no...how about jihad. There have been more killed in the name of god, than in the name of all other categories combined. Look it up, my examples are just the icing on the cake. The atrocities carried out by the Nazis were child's play compared to the torture of the nonbelievers of Christianity, Islam, etc. One of the main reasons the Nazis tried to kill Jews, was because the Jews were responsible for Jesus death (now that sounds less like atheism than you thought). Religion is a weapon of mass destruction. You say that evolution has not been entirely proven yet. Well s***, we have not even had 2 centuries yet to do so. Christianity has had 2000 years to come up with a single shred of proof, and they have not. How many people have tried to prove religion, none of them could. Evolution is still new, just an unprovable theory like gravity. Darwin looked at the evidence, and made his theory. Even if his exact words were wrong, the evidence is not, and it says we evolved. You want the evidence of how fish became amphibian, ever hear of a COELACANTH, there is a new creature that closes that gap in evolution even further than that. Do some research, and think before you type. God did not make the universe, because the universe is eternal, no beginning. This may be hard for you, but give yourself time so your head does not explode from all of the evidence against your thoughts.

Answer 3

"INSTEAD the fossil records indisputably show that the majority, if not all of the of the worlds 40 highest category in the animal kingdom… virtually sprang forth with unique new body plans fully formed and without transitionary fossils preceding them"

I have seen evidence that this is not the case, I don't know why you think it's not. I'm not sure about the accuracy of that statement, do you have some evidence in mind?
As to your first paragraph, I don't think we can base truth on what we think would work out best. Otherwise, I would say no one dies in car accidents, because it would work out better if they didn't.
And there have been some hideously terrible christians that perpetrated terrible crimes against humanity. Slave traders and those in charge of the witch hunts, spanish inquisition, and crusades some to mind.
And you seem to have confused some of your arguments, evolution is not an argument for atheism. They are unrelated topics, you just see them conjoined here, and it seems as thought they're related. They're not.
I've included a website that can help you construct effective, logic based arguments. You may find it useful.
Thanks for your question!

Edit:

I read your whole question. I just marvel that you think that you have "defeated" science. There is evidence that evolution works on a macroscopic scale. You said there wasn't. The falgellum argument is decent, but evolution isn't a static concept set down by Darwin, it changes and adapts to accurately reflect the evidence. That's why it's science. Things like, protiens being present in the cell with another function being adapted to be used as a flagellum is a reasonable case. It is not evidence to dismiss anything but the first crude theory. You are taking random bits of science that you've heard and stringing them together and assuming that they make sense that way, and it's just not true. And as for design, it could be true, few people say it's not possible, although I have heard some credible reasons to think otherwise, it is, of course, impossible to prove. There are many scientists that believe that evolution is guided by design. But it's not possible to prove that, it's what they believe, it's not backed by scientific reason, and it's not repeatable. At least not as of yet. So it stands outside the realm of science, and inside the realm of religion. I'm sorry, but my remarks stand, I have not seen any evidence that what you say is true.
You show a remarkable lack of respect for scientists to think that they are so attached to an idea that they are trying to prove it's true despite evidence. Science finds reasonable explanations for evidence and then uses that to predict the pattern it will follow in the future. If it was trying to stick to one theory it would not be science anymore, it would be doctrine.

Answer 4

Darwinism is a false religion; yet, it is one of the largest and most widespread religions in the world. It has forcefully influenced people through its various methods of propaganda and of falsification and obfuscation. Over generations the number of its adherents has been growing. Unconsciously, people have become affected by this false religion and, with time, can become serious Darwinists.
But facts are being continually uncovered in the realm of science that this godless religion cannot tolerate. With every new development people are once again coming face to face with the reality of creation. The religion of Darwinism is losing strength before questions about how living things first came into existence, the flawless design and complex structure of living creatures, the variety in species, etc. Every day it loses one more lifeline, for it is a religion that is founded on blind faith and remains impotent in the face of developments in molecular biology, genetics, paleontology and biomathematics. The many recent discoveries in these branches of science show clearly and definitely that evolution is not true.
The only true fact demonstrated time and again by scientific advances is the reality of creation. If you look even with the naked eye at the living things around you, you will find the proof of an extraordinary intelligence, strategy and design. Whether you examine a microscopic sea creature, a single atom, a cell or any living organism, you find an astounding composition. This great intelligence, flawless planning and precise design in every part of nature comes from Allah, to whom all power and ability belong.

Answer 5

Yes, an evangelistic Christian is a good source for an unbaised appraisal of atheists and other non-Christians. He'd have a tough time showing that the atrocities committed by some of those he named were due to atheism, unlike the atrocities that can easily be shown to be driven by religion. If the Christians who did bad things in the name of Christ were "not really Christians", then I'm happy to say that that means the guys he names "weren't really atheists".

Lee Strobel. I'm reading his "Case for a Creator" right now. What a waste of $14. I'm thinking of blogging my critique on my 360 page. He's a tool. A rusty one, at that.

After the Dover case, I thought that no one would accept Behe as a reference on any matters. I guess I was wrong. I wouldn't ask him to answer a phone, not to mention a question on evolution.

Answer 6

If there is a lack of convincing evidence to back up Darwin's claim then there is no evidence to back up ID or creationism. The Bible is not a scientific source for evidence.

Answer 7

the greatest sin is stupidity. and the unwillingness to use your brain.
Do not believe something simply because you have heard it. Do not believe anything simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not believe anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do not believe anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of teachers, elders, or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it, and live up to it.

Answer 8

To answer the main question, alot of animals evolved from very early ancestors.

Answer 9

wow you are one of my favorites! God is good all the time and people that hate do not realize what they are actually doing. walking midlessly around blinded by todays modern world. sins have always been around and will continue to be until the last days. thanks for the info! God BLESS ;)

Answer 10

I completely agree with you!