is it better (or worse), biologically, chemically, anatomically, spiritually or whatever else to have sex the first time in thirties. or is there a disadvantage - once the young 'exciting' yrs are gone, it may not be such a thrill? Maybe even 'down there' might not be such a great treat to your lover?
2006-06-27 05:07:33 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Wow, if someone actually waited til their thirties now a days, I'd respect them imensely. I honestly don't know if it'd be better or worse. "Down there" would still be a treat because you'd be thirty and still tight. And I don't think it really matters how old you are, your first time is always a thrill. :-)
2006-06-27 05:12:52 · answer #1 · answered by Rose 3 · 9⤊ 3⤋
First of all I am unsure what you think when you say the good years are gone in the thirties. Life begins at forty and until then you are still wet behind the ears. Granted the thirties are not common for virgins but non the less, do not miss out all your life. There is a lot for you to learn and the thirties might be a good time to learn. Nothing wrong with starting a little later just remember to be careful not paranoid. Sex is to be enjoyed and if your uptight about it there is very little enjoyment. Protect you and your partner from disease (std), unwanted pregnancy and enjoy yourself. It is fun, good for you and provides a good alternative after a romantic evening to chinese checkers or cards. Just joking. Get your feet wet, we are built to last and you are right on time. Have a good time and good luck.
2006-06-27 12:16:03 · answer #2 · answered by andyman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it would be pretty disappointing to wait until your 30 to find out you don't like sex or to not know what you're doing and have to practice. People aren't as patient with 30-year-old lovers who don't know what the heck they're doing in bed. At that age, people want to experiment, not go back to the basics with someone. It's like a professional bike racer being told to put the training wheels back on his bike.
Maybe if it's two 30 year old virgins together, they could enjoy fumbling around, but for someone older who already knows it can be frustrating.
2006-06-27 12:15:17 · answer #3 · answered by bodinibold 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you find a 30 year old Female, that's great for the dude because he gets to be special for once. But for the dude who's just now getting some cootie cat at 30, he either had no luck or had no desire for it or is gay.
2006-06-27 12:11:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about you, I'm 31, in great shape and it is even better because I have honed my skills as a professional and not like some teenage kid with a squirt gun.
2006-06-27 12:11:41 · answer #5 · answered by "THE BEAST" 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if it's because you are a virgin and you waited til you got married, then it's worth it. i don't see any advantages or disadvantages to someone's age. i do know a lot of ppl who regret having so many partners before 30. so it's definately safer physically and emotionally.
2006-06-27 12:11:48 · answer #6 · answered by midnightrose 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
30 come on Why in the world would u wait that long
2006-06-27 12:11:51 · answer #7 · answered by Hea Dude ! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, it's better to do that in your thirties than at the age of thirteen or even less...
2006-06-27 12:13:03 · answer #8 · answered by Gyte 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good sex is in your head not just in the bed. Thirty is just a number dude.
2006-06-27 12:10:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, if it was after marriage and you're christian or islamic, then that's only good..
if not, then well, society these days think that if you're stll a virgin by 18, you're good to go like a taco... [sorry juz had to say that]
well, it's not wrong.
2006-06-27 12:10:54 · answer #10 · answered by Miss M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋