Wikipedia article (Too bad if you don't like it)
Susan Shields is another former member of Mother Teresa's order who is now critical of her, especially regarding the following of monastic tradition and vows of poverty and obedience to the Catholic church. Shields also questions whether being poor is the best way to help other poor, and if redemptive suffering is really conducive in helping them. Having been in Mother Teresa's order for ten years, she states that large transactions of cash occurred; most were deposited in the Vatican Bank. Shields claims she has no knowledge how this money was used, but believes Mother Teresa did a disservice to the poor and unsuspecting nuns in the order
2006-06-27
04:04:05
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
In 1991, Dr. Robin Fox, then editor of the British medical journal The Lancet, visited the Home for Dying Destitute in Calcutta and described the medical care the patients received as "haphazard". He observed that sisters and volunteers, some of whom had no medical knowledge, had to make decisions about patient care, because of the lack of doctors in the hospice. Dr. Fox specifically held Teresa responsible for conditions in this home, and observed that her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients; people who could otherwise survive their ordeals would be at a heightened risk of dying from infections and lack of treatment.
2006-06-27
04:04:34 ·
update #1
Providing an opposing viewpoint was William Dohohue, president of the Catholic League. Donohue admitted that "[Mother] Teresa wanted people to live in impoverished conditions so she could identify with the poor whom she was serving". This drew a derisive comment from Penn Jillette: "They had to suffer, so that [she] could be enlightened? What a saint; she must've been so enlightened she glowed in the dark!"
2006-06-27
04:05:22 ·
update #2
Hitchens further alleged that Mother Teresa lied to donors about what their contributions were to be used for. Donors, he says, were told that the money went to aid and the construction of healthcare facilities in India and elsewhere. Evidence points to it instead being spent largely on missionary work and that Mother Teresa was actually the controller of some of the funds. No hospitals were ever built. In 1994, Hitchens published an article in The Nation entitled "The Ghoul of Calcutta". [1]
2006-06-27
04:06:22 ·
update #3
It's nice to see that some of you don't even bother reading the material. You just automatically say "You should be more like her." Ridiculous. All public figures are open for criticism I don't care how 'nice' you think they are.
2006-06-27
04:12:09 ·
update #4