2006-06-27 03:38:50 · 25 answers · asked by klunk 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I'm assuming this isn't a real question.
Besides...all military men in uniform are good looking.
2006-06-27 03:44:53 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Gender equality should not be about both sexes/genders (and persons in between- there are this kind of huge volume of more desirable than Western society realizes) being waiting to finish all a similar duties. women and men would properly be equivalent with out being a similar, and it really is the reason there are nevertheless such regulations. regrettably, it isn't as straightforward as our society needs (no longer purely contained in the defense force or workplace), and classic gender roles are nevertheless predicted to be observed in Western society. Feminists usually wrestle hostile to themselves even, and that i do not comprehend the position the best judgment went in this argument. Why is it a nasty aspect that women and men have kinds of intelligence and abilities? How and who judges what's extra efficient and extra valued in society? i imagine we favor to be troublesome the media so a lot extra, annoying equivalent pay for equivalent paintings, and make society comprehend how both sexes are significant in diverse options; and not in any respect all men or all women in good structure into mainly defined roles. yet, it is going too a options to assume equivalent numbers of men and women in certain paintings roles- maximum persons see the reasoning in the back of isolating women and men in activities...
2016-11-29 19:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by arwood 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, why should they? That's like telling the nation that good looks get you anything, no one else is exempt from the military unless you have a disability.
2006-06-27 03:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by Mitch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should put all the good looking men from both sides out front. They would look at each other and decide they don't want to fight anymore.
2006-06-27 03:41:14 · answer #4 · answered by AlphaFemale 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not a smart question...........lol. good looking or ugly is not a factor for directing military combat, just look at some of the old military leaders they show on tv............lol.
2006-06-27 03:42:02 · answer #5 · answered by crackalac 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, and people wonder why you are a racist. Who decides who is the good looking guy, and by what criteria? Are you trying a form of eugenics, Hitler move over we got a new reservation in hell.
2006-06-27 03:50:11 · answer #6 · answered by Dan S 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Looks have nothing to do with combat ability. Stupidity, however does. I guess that makes it safe for you.
2006-06-27 03:43:03 · answer #7 · answered by zharantan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Congratulations. You have won the Darwin prize for being the least evolved person on the planet.
2006-06-27 04:09:57 · answer #8 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's absolutely ridicules!!! My husband is one the best looking men I have ever seen and he proudly serves our country as a US Marine. Elvis was hott as hell and he served. It's not good to show your immaturity and ignorance.
2006-06-27 04:09:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I am in after all
2006-06-27 03:41:50 · answer #10 · answered by WDubsW 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋