English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

"Monkeys are stll there to prove Theory of Evolution is wrong.If the theory of Surival of Fittest,man and monkey cannot co exist "

why is this so? do they share a niche?

2006-06-27 00:04:58 · 6 answers · asked by gwbruce_2000 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

ernest77 you are quoting 1859,!!!!!
we have developed our understanding since then, science 'evolves' with new knowledge

2006-06-27 00:18:45 · update #1

6 answers

Post an addendum to your question - you don't need a whole new question.

Leoin is obviously blissfully unaware (or more likely doesn't want to hear) that man and ape SHARED a common ancestor and evolution is based on branches not strength lines.

One more bit of amateur science to try to bolster an obviously wavering faith.

2006-06-27 00:07:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The 'new knowledge' that modern science has 'evolved' actually makes it more difficult to believe in macroevolution. Neither 'gradual change' nor 'punctuated equilibrium' can account for macroevolution WITHIN MODERN SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK.

Here are a few concepts that work against macroevolution:
1. Irreducible complexity
2. High information content of DNA sequencing
3. The Anthropic Principle
4. Computer simulations (Murry Eden - MIT and Marcel Schutzenberg - Univ. of Paris)

Contrary to what we are told, the advancement of science is NOT casting up new challenges to the Christain faith but rather uncovering ever more powerful evidence that what Christians believe is true.

2006-06-27 00:41:32 · answer #2 · answered by flandargo 5 · 0 0

DARWIN SAYS HIS TEORY IS NO MORE WITH HIS OWN WORDS!!!
In Asia, Africa and Australia lives a remarkable creature the archerfish that shoots down its prey from the air above it with a burst of water. It uses its tongue and the top of its mouth to form a groove simiilar to a gun barrel. Then by compressing its gills it squirts water up to six feet with deadly accuracy -- in spite of the distortion caused by seeing the target from below the surface of water.
Evolutionists still don't know how the archerfish got its amazing abilities.They can only wonder. Viewid through the distortion of evolution they cannot explain how the archerfish gradually learned to not aim where its eyes see but to aim instead at a different spot where the target actually is.
Without its binocular vision it couldnot see the object with such precision and without the special shape of the upper mouth and a specialized tongue it could not make the groove it needs to shoot lthe concentrated jet of water. Many factors have to appear together and be perfectly formed for this shooting mechanism to work. This of course goes totally against Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory which is based on a gradual step by step process.
Darwin wrote in (The Origin of Species)-- "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous successive slight modifications my theory would absolutely break down"(1859, p. 171).
The archerfish offers precisely such an example since several complex systems must all appear at the same time perfectly and not gradually formed--binocular vision,a specialized mouth and tongue, specialized gills to compress and expel water and an aiming system based in the brain and not in the eyes. If any of these parts is missing the mechanism will not hit the target and no survival advantage is created.
When you get down to the facts the archerfish with one squirt of its gills shoots down Charles Darwin's entire theory of evolution and that by Darwin's own admission!!!
So evolution doesn't have the answer to this mystery. But the Bible does. Genesis 1:20-21 says that God created all the creatures that live in the water. He created a great variety of perfectly formed fish including the archerfish with all its special features such as binocular vision other specialized organs and a built in ability to compenste for the distortion of the water.

2006-06-27 00:14:31 · answer #3 · answered by His eyes are like flames 6 · 0 0

His answer had nothing to do with your question. You asked why do money's stand still. He answered why there are still monkeys. He's saying that monkeys still exist because the theory of man evolving from monkey's must be wrong. But that's not what you asked. You asked why monkey's that should be jumping around are standing still. The answer to your question is that all animals stand still sometimes. Either to rest, or to ponder memories. But if they were smart enough, they would take over. Because that is the nature of the beast.

2006-06-27 00:15:28 · answer #4 · answered by Spirit-X 4 · 0 0

Get'em!

2006-06-27 00:12:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

you need to alter your original question

2006-06-27 00:11:03 · answer #6 · answered by break 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers