English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would that prove that our move to war was a mistake?

2006-06-26 18:03:16 · 18 answers · asked by JoeThatUKnow 3 in Politics & Government Military

18 answers

Google "Saddam, WMD, Spetsnez."


The WMD were moved by Russian Spetsnaz (special forces) units out of uniform, that were specifically sent to Iraq to move the weaponry and eradicate any evidence of its existence.

General Georges Sada, the number two man in the Iraq Air Force describes how Saddam moved his WMDs to Syria before the American invasion, planned to destroy Israel in the '90s, and yearned to rule the Arab world in the book Saddam's Secrets: How an Iraqi General Defied And Survived Saddam Hussein

2006-06-26 18:21:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If people think that small potatoes stuff we found in Iraq was a good reason to be there than I want to know what there smoking. Bush and the White House don't even think its a big deal. Half the stuff doesn't work and the other is WWI vintage stuff.
People who want us over there are grasping anything to justify being in Iraq. So they say "We found the mother load. We have made the big find, these are the WMD's we were looking for"
Guess what? Bush thinks its a joke, Cheney thinks its a joke, and the press and most of the country think its old news.
As for sources saying theres alot more there that's a joke. Some sources told Bush that Saddam had WMD's and then found out these sources lied.
Remember we were told Saddam had remote control airplanes he could use to fly into U.S targets? Can't find those either.
Remember Saddam had tubes from Africa he was going to use to enrich uranium? The only tubes they found were way to small and flimsy to ever be able to make to enrich uranium according to atomic experts.
If Saddam was loaded with all these WMD's, don't you think he would have used them before or during the invasion?
Oh and by the way, Saddam hated Bin Laden and Bin Laden hated Saddam. The only terror connection between those two was made by a Czech spy who claimed that Saddam and a member of al-qaeda met in Prague. British, German, Israeli, C.I.A intelligence confirmed this never happened and the Czech spy was unreliable.

2006-06-27 01:35:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Though some posters are saying wmd"s have been found ,in just reading the paper the government admits they have found none ,yet here they are saying that isn't so. We already kicked Saddams *** once , Bush senior knew this quagmire we are in now would happen thats why we didn't go to bagdad the first time. The only threat they posed was already removed. The people of the world know this and we've lost credibility and look even worse as George jr. dismantles our constitution and considers us all Al Quaida , wiretapping, invading internet email , bank accounts . He"s proven his distrust of the american people and yet expects our unbridled support? He's basically done nothing to fight terror except divert our attention so as to look as if he has , all the while overstepping his authority and circumventing the congress and house of representatives which were supposed to be a safety valve against such things. But thats what happens when all one party rules. Its never to our advantage republican or democrat for all branches of government to be of one party it just doesn't work well and that is becoming more apparent daily as the number of casualties in Iraq approach the number of lives lost on 911 .

2006-06-27 01:53:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mustard canisters are destructive if you are about 100 yards away. Listen We knew both the North Koreans and Iranians were working on WMD's when we declared war on Iraq. The problem, inmy opinion, was they didn't have enough of a villanous leader to sell the war to the masses. Iraq on the other hand had Saddam Hussein, our old enemy whom we supplied with weapons, a man with an army we knew we could whip. See if this was about WMD's we would have gone at it with Iran or North Korea, if it was about freedom from oppression, we would have sent troops into Sierra Leone. The only thing left is the proverbial Red Herring. The thing a magician does to make you miss what he is doing by distracting you. And it worked. Did you notice how people have celebrated the fall of the impotent dictator Saddam, while the real enemy Osama Bin Laden remains free?

2006-06-27 01:12:11 · answer #4 · answered by nagurski3 3 · 0 0

No because it has been proven that there was a significant terror connection and WMD's..

Which proves that the war was not a mistake.

2006-06-27 01:15:01 · answer #5 · answered by Boob 3 · 0 0

well we found wmds but libs don't went to believe it because they hate bush they still believe bush made 911 i am sure they don't believe we went to the moon ether look at the libs below that says the government said we didn't find wmd when i watched it on TV the other day at a press conference a U.S general said we have found 500 rounds FULL of WMDS and no it wasn't from ww1 or defective like the other lib says like i said libs love to lie about bush

2006-06-27 01:24:54 · answer #6 · answered by MIKE B 4 · 0 0

but it has already been proven that saddam gave money to terrorist organizations .also about 400 wmds have been found in iraq.even some of saddams own people have told us that the big stuff was sent to syria prior to the invasion.

2006-06-27 01:07:00 · answer #7 · answered by glock509 6 · 0 0

Yes. But that would be impossible to prove.

Look AT THE DATE OF THIS QUOTE:

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

******That is a year after Clinton bombed Iraq, and before Bush was in office. Why would she say that in 1999? Everyone knew saddam was a threat.

NOW LOOK AT THIS ONE:

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

*******"we've known for many years....." Many years means before bush was in office.


NOW THIS QUOTE:

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

*******over the past 11 years....Before Bush was in office


NOW MY FAVORITE QUOTE:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002


*********"given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists....



SO WHAT WOULD PROVE OTHERWISE?

2006-06-27 01:18:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yesterday's news, dude.

We are continuing to make the same mistake by staying there. This Administration (and their Congressional lapdogs) want three more years of this. More of the same. Remember that slogan come November.

2006-06-27 01:07:07 · answer #9 · answered by PermDude 4 · 0 0

The past is the least of our concerns right now. History will prove it all either way, but for now we all need to concentrate on the "noble" Iraqis stepping up for their newly elected government so our troops can come home.

2006-06-27 01:07:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers