2006-06-26 17:21:17 · 15 answers · asked by nojokekid1 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
there are 7
2006-06-26 17:25:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Sorry but this is an irrelevant question. The U.S armed forces are a volunteer force therefore everybody in Iraq has volunteered to serve.
If any son or daughter of a congressman has volunteered to join the military they will do their turn over there.
Therefore the question should be how many troops in the armed forces are sons and daughters of congress men and women.
Even then I don't know what the answer would prove as everyone is a volunteer.
2006-06-26 21:24:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are 7 and all are not officers. At least one is a Staff Sgt.
5 Republicans & 2 Democrats. No surprise there. Percentage wise it is more than the average US population serving.
2006-06-26 17:43:41 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no longer plenty yet then maximum congressmen, commonly used round fifty 8 years of age So even if if their little ones had served in the protection rigidity, they'd have served years in the past because the overall age of their little ones will be round 33 years of age. yet the following is a factoid for you. 20 republican congressmen have served provided that 1991 2 democratic congressmen have served provided that 1991
2016-11-15 07:39:34 · answer #4 · answered by garneau 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Few. However if you went to any fortune 500 firm and polled 535 people the results would not change much. So whats your point, it's a Volunter service. I did & would again if needed.
2006-06-27 07:29:20 · answer #5 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it doesnt matter because no matter who volunteers for the military will go to war if needed. remember people volunteer for the military not drafted currently. all the people crying over sons and daughters having killed in iraq should remember they didnt have to volunteer to jion the military. simple as that.
2006-06-27 03:52:55 · answer #6 · answered by crackalac 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None. Rich people are worth too much to put their own lives or the lives of their loved ones in the line of fire in the wars they declare.
On the other hand, we the 'citizens' (read: serfs) are expendable.
2006-06-26 17:26:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know Michale Moore. Get your own lame questions, don't rip off a fat lazy Canadian piece of crap. next thing you know you will be singing Heart Will Go On.
2006-06-27 03:08:03 · answer #8 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you got that off of Fahrenhiet 911, you freaking copy cat. yes i watched the movie.
2006-06-26 17:25:15 · answer #9 · answered by kev 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably quite a few. I see where you're going with this and it's stupid. You need to quit being Mr. Internet politician.
2006-06-26 17:25:50 · answer #10 · answered by arabslayer34 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋