(false hearty laugh) wow, you're really funny.
2006-06-26 06:17:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
You can reason with evolutionists - and they will happily debate with you and provide plenty of verifiable evidence to strengthen their arguments. The same cannot be said for creationists - I've never met a single creationist who can back up the creation argument with any verifiable evidence or logical thought.
It's also not possible for a creationist to evolve from an evolutionist. To evolve from something, that something needs to be around at an earlier time. Evolutionists only started appearing about 150 years ago, whereas creationists have been around since the dawn of religion. As evolutionists came much later than creationists, it would be far more logical to say that evolutionists may have evolved from creationists.
And as a final note, evolutionists do not claim that humans evolved from monkeys. They claim that humans and monkeys both evolved from a common ancestor - which seems to be far more likely than the creationist claim that humans came from dirt, therefore making dirt our nearest relative.
2006-06-26 13:29:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Toutatis 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution is based on hard science. And that science is becoming more and more complete every day. With the advent of DNA testing we are able to find linkages between species that were previously (and correctly!) speculated on. For example, we know that humans, gorillas and chimpanzees share more than 97% of their genome.
At this point we know definitively that the world was not created in 6 days. If you're honest with yourself, you'll know that religion has shown itself to be poor at explaining the "what is the nature of things?" and "how do they work?" questions that science attempts to answer. I might also add that the same science industry that you are attempting to cast doubt on is the one that developed the internal combustion engine which allows you to get to work, refrigeration which allows you to buy your food at the supermarket, televisions, medicine, DNA, camera phones, GPS, and even the computer that you used to compose your little tirade. It's impossibly ignorant that you and others of your ilk would bite the hand that feeds you and single out a legitimate area of science, when you are yourself surrounded by and benefit from things that are steeped in the cumulative effect of hundreds of years of science.
Your argument is irrational and misinformed.
You're resentful of science for categorizing you with chimpanzees and gorillas, because you feel different from and probably superior to those animals. That's understandable, you are 3% different genetically. There is a lot of water under that bridge. It's not like they're saying that the two branches of the family split off yesterday. Although, maybe your branch became human a little later than the rest of us! :)
In the end, your knee-jerk reaction is will not change that these evolutionary theories are backed by hard facts. If you feel that your religious beliefs are threatened, think about the fact that science doesn't answer the "why?" questions and you'll start to understand the importance of religion, to help us find meaning and purpose in our existence.
2006-06-26 14:04:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by nicemachine 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The anwers can be found in Intelligent Design! Evolution proves God exists. The debate has ended, your decision has been made.
* There are proven gaps in scientific knowledge.
* Intelligence leaves behind a characteristic signature (like an artist) of logical progression through a series of systematic methodical stages.
* The gaps in science are filled in by acts of a Designer.
* The scientific study of fossil records reveals these signatures again and again.
* God Created the process of Evolution!
* Evolution shows the existence of God!
For more information on I.D., please click avatar to view the I.D. FAQ on my Q&A page.
Glory be ID
2006-06-26 13:29:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In 1991 Zechariah Sitchin published his research findings entitled "Genesis Revisited: Is Modern Science Catching Up With Ancient Knowledge?". One of his findings were made while he was matching the Dead Sea scrolls with fragments of clay he found on the spot where Adam's footprints are also found. The clay pieces had Sumerian writings and drawings that proposed that Adam was made by Niinti (as instructed by God) through the cloning of an ape's egg with that of God's fragment in a huge test tube. This test tube then was made out of clay. Before Adam, Niinti had other experiments: the sphinx, the phoenix...
Aw! just read the book and draw your coclusions, because it also suggests that God lives in planet Jupiter(?) and that our purpose in creation was to gather gold that was to shield the twelfth planet (Jupiter) from radiation as it passes close to the sun.
2006-06-26 14:05:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Vince 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Historically, you are wrong because evolutionists came AFTER the world was covered in the darkness of religion, superstition, and the belief in some supernatural arbiter.
Darwin wasn't even born until the 1800's. Religions were around for thousands of years beforehand (as was blood-letting, belief that the world is flat, burning witches, etc). So chronologically speaking, your pithy little diatribe is inherently and childishly incorrect.
Don't you think?
Or do you?
2006-06-26 13:29:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by l00kiehereu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The great thing about blindly believing the Bible is that there's no need for evidence, so all the answers are ready-made.
Science is slower, and relies on things like logic and reason... you know, humanity's God-given gifts!
2006-06-26 13:21:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
folks like you are what make this site soooo very entertaining...
"evolutionists can't prove the missing link" and "theologians can't prove a big, white man who wears a robe and sits on a cloud." honestly, this place gets better every day.
keep up the good work...
2006-06-26 13:21:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by tikiboy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmm no proof, and you can disprove evolution with the logical process of human thinking? I guess that makes them about as intellegent as monkeys because they didnt use that process.
2006-06-26 13:22:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by afguy901 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is not true we are made from The maan made love with the monkey and they had weird looking kids. But is also is what you believe.
2006-06-26 13:20:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by spazboy2020 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not nice to call evolutionists monkeys, but hey, to each their own.
2006-06-26 13:20:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by mrsdokter 5
·
0⤊
0⤋