Ok... did anyone ever think that if gays were meant to really be gay. Then why can't they reproduce?... If you were "born" gay... it is impossible for you to reproduce... and all things that were meant to be can do this. So... wouldn't an intelligent person say... hey?... this isn't right... it doesn't work... it can't work... and I'm not talking about trying to relate them with people that are like infertile... no... I mean.. no matter what... no homosexual couple will have have a child from eachother. Doesn't it make sense... ? It's because it's NOT MEANT TO BE! When are you people going to get it. If you look into homosexuality from a medical standpoint... The majority of gays either A: Come from a broken home with a majority of the opposite sex... B: Was raped or molested at a young age by the same sex.... or C: Have a chemical imbalance resulting in too much estrogen for men or too much progesterone in women.
2006-06-26
05:57:42
·
28 answers
·
asked by
?
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
or last but not least D: Have had or do have trouble being accepted by the opposite sex.. so they look for an alternative...
2006-06-26
05:58:05 ·
update #1
OK.. STOP WITH THE STERILE COMMENTS.. DIDN'T YOU READ THE FULL QUESTION!? I ALREADY TOUCHED ON THAT. NONE OF YOU HAVE GOOD BACKING ARGUMENTS TO SUPPORT WHAT YOU SAY...
"Gay people just want to love... blah blah blah" I never said the people are terrible people... what I said what... homosexuality isn't meant to be. Infertility happens but it is NOT common in MOST couples. Gay people can NEVER have babies. That's not my only argument against it...
2006-06-26
06:10:59 ·
update #2
Some people are so ignorant... Read my other questions to answer the pathetic questions that you have googly... I answer the same questions over and over and over...
Poor you...
lemme guess 35ish? Home alone? Bored?
2006-06-26
07:59:19 ·
update #3
OH AND MY HUSBAND IS IN THE NAVY PROTECTING YOURS DEAR... ALSO.. I HAVE GAY FRIENDS... SO YOU PEOPLE ACT LIKE I SAID GAYS ARE EVIL.. I DIDN'T SAY THAT..
HATE THE SIN NOT THE SINNER...
2006-06-26
08:02:10 ·
update #4
Oh.. and magpiex? Just because everyone that has sex doesn't get pregnant.. doesn't mean they can't... that has to do with their ovulation time... but that doesn't mean it's impossible.
It IS however impossible for gays to reproduce... that was my point. If you read my other Q and A's you would know the truth...
2006-06-26
08:06:47 ·
update #5
All I can say to that is Just remember what happened in Sodom and Gamora. Just like God allowed Satan to prove himself he has allowed this to happen so that people will be held accountable for what they do. He will. say to the goats, stand to my left and to his sheeps stand to my right. Although people think they can justify their endless needs their deeds here on earth will not amount to anything there in Heaven. No, they won't die, but they will have wished they hadn't done those things. people often learn things a little bit too late. But some poeple have been told that this is wrong and yet they continue to do it. All you and I can say is we told you it was wrong, now you know, so you can't tell God, Noone told me about this. Don't worry about what other people say to you about this because they don't really know what's going on. Gays and lesbians can tell you anything they want to make justifications. And no, God didn't make a mistake and that person in a womans body or a mans body. All they have to do is look down in front of them and see what God Made them to be. It's there for a reason. these people don't know any better. Later>
2006-06-26 06:17:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
8⤋
Gay people most certainly CAN have babies--just not with each other. But I sense that is not the specific inanity that you are expressing, so here we go:
I got news for you, about 99.999999999% of all sexual activity between heterosexual people do not result in childbirth.
100% of sexual acts between homosexuals do not result in childbirth.
Therefore heterosexuality is statistically only about 0.000000001% more effective than homosexuality in producing offspring.
Kind of puts the whole "the purpose of sexual attraction is to produce offspring so any non-producing attraction (except for sterility which I'll ignore because it's inconvenient) must be unnatural" in perspective, doesn't it?
Besides, as the world population reaches the point of unsustainability-- as it is rapidly doing now-- one would expect that an Intelligent Designer would have created a variety of built-in mechanisms to slow population growth, one of which would include an increase in same-sex, non-producing attraction that preserves the reproductive sexual urge while ensuring a decrease in new children.
Your comments about "looking into it from a medical standpoint" are dishonest and foolish. The medical standpoint concluded decades ago that homosexuality is a natural albeit minority condition. Medicine long ago gave up the idiotic notion that homosexuality was a disease that required a cure. Religion is the only institution that still believes that. You are appealing to an authority that soundly contradicts your position.
Edit: You keep moving the goalposts. If heterosexual sex is "right" or "natural" because it leads to childbirth, then heterosexual people who CAN have children but DON'T are just as wrong as homosexuals, since they are chosing a lifestyle that ALSO does not lead to reproduction.
In fact a couple that can have children but doesn't is more "wrong" than a homosexual one, since they are actively thwarting the reproductive process, instead of merely bypassing it.
2006-06-26 13:35:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that Homosexuality is such a good idea. It's dangerous physically, socially, and psychologically. It's real easy to find yourself in a dangerously terrible situation while living that lifestyle. It's a lot like drugs and alcohol. Some people can handle it, but it totally ruins many people's lives. Also, homosexuality looks like the product of a mind far too concerned with sexuality. A person wants to have sex so bad, they'd become gay to do it. The sad fact is that we can't all have sex. Especially these days. We can't let our desire to have sex, the endless bragging (and lying) of our peers, and that spinning orange mind job that television and the media pulls on us regularly bring us to the point where we're willing to do something so drastic just to get laid.
Now, don't get me wrong. If that's what you want to do, I certainly won't try to stop you, but it really doesn't look like such a good idea.
2006-06-26 13:11:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Though it is Adam and Eve, the bible teaches us to love each other. If God really want to make every one the same, I probably look just like you and I don't think you want to have a DICK.
Also, the bible does not say that all homosexuals go straight to hell, it is said that those who believes in god will be forgiven allowed to enter heaven.
If you think that most gay people have problems or what not, then you should go out there and ask them if they have some type of childhood trauma. Not all gays or lesbians or bisexuals are from broken families. Infact most of them came from a family that loves them and most are middle income families.
If you don't like others to be different than you that you should live with it. In this country gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people have to work, pay taxes and follow the same rules, laws and regulations as you straight people do. So, why can't you just leave us alone?
The declaration of independence says this, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINES."
I have as much rights as straight people to pursue my happiness if I want to date guys or girls and there aint nothing you could do about it.
Specially if My boyfriend is in Iraq protecting your AS# just so that you could talk freely and not get shot by TERRORISTS.
2006-06-26 13:18:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do you seem to have such a problem with gay people? Who cares WHY a person chooses their lifestyle and wether they can reproduce or not? There are women out there that can't physically have children either so are they just.. not meant to love? Its just not meant to be for them? Being homosexual isn't about having children, its about love. Its not about what happened in their lives because their are plenty of people who are NOT gay that have experienced the same things.
2006-06-26 13:04:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by TiFFeRz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Until you start living your life as a naked hunter gatherer, you are really in no position to tell others they must live their lives according to 'nature'. There is lmost nothing natural about the modern way of life.
Your argument is lame even if we were to accept that natural=good, because there are other species with non-reproductive members, such as ants and bees. Direct reproduction is not the only way to propogate your genes.
Your point (C) contradicts your premise that being gay isn't natural. If you have a hormone 'imbalance', that's natural.
Are hermaphrodites gay no matter what they do, or are they straight no matter what they do?
2006-06-26 13:06:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by lenny 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obviously you didn't attend the Pride Parade in the Great NW this weekend. Who are you to say how others live their life. I am straight, but see many beautiful people from both sexes who are gay so you need to stop judging others based on your flawed and limited mind.
By the way, nice picture with rainbow backdrop.
You are an idiot full of bigotry and innate ignorance.
This is not how Jesus taught you to live.
The hypocrisy is why many have a problem with Christians.
2006-06-26 13:04:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Subterfuge 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok....What's your view on hermaphrodites? Homosexuality in animals? Homosexual rape in bed bugs?? Humans born with NO sexual genitalia?(Androgynous)??? There are MANY more examples.
Your view is limited by the lack of knowledge the authors of the bible had about the workings of life on Earth.
It looks like you need to read more, girlie...
Seeing as you are taking this from the bible, do you go out and kill gays too like it tells you to, or do you pick and choose what to believe, like all xtians? Hmm? No answer then? Satan got your tongue???
Hypocrite...
**********************
Again, miss, "I know the truth"...How come you can't answer this: What's your view on hermaphrodites? Homosexuality in animals? Homosexual rape in bed bugs?? Humans born with NO sexual genitalia?(Androgynous)??? Products of the devil? I didn't know he was a creator too!! Your argument falls at the first hurdle, child.
"NONE OF YOU HAVE GOOD BACKING ARGUMENTS TO SUPPORT WHAT YOU SAY... " - Picking and choosing what you read, are you? I thought that was just for when you read the bible...LOL
2006-06-26 13:05:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by googlywotsit 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've tried making a point many times but it seems Satan has blinded them all...but that's not the only thing that is being accepted and seen as normal, there are and will be many other things happening that are sinful but considered good.
Like the Bible says: There will come a time when good is seen as evil and evil as good. That's what's happening, so buckle up.
2006-06-26 13:05:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥JCluvsu2!♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
If that is your only reason, I ask you this: What about people who are sterile? Is that just all in their minds as well? This planet is overpopulated enough, and a lot of gay couples are giving homes to babies abandoned by the element that was "meant to be" according to you.
2006-06-26 13:04:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Leela13 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My goodness, I have never heard it put better. I completely agree with you, but I have never thought of the "can't reproduce" factor. You definitely make a great argument. I also agree with your three points at the end about why people end up being gap, and I completely agree with all three. Well said!
2006-06-26 13:02:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Faith C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋