Sounds kind of vague and wrong. Gaps don't prove anything. Gaps are the unknown. We can make educated guesses about what happens in them, though. The laws of physics create logical progression through a series of systematic methodical stages. That is happening everywhere, all the time. God doesn't have anything to do with it, unless he wrote the laws of physics, and then left.
2006-06-26 05:55:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
10⤋
For crying out loud- ID is not proven by this. A form of ID may have been how God created things, but He seems to have been careful to not leave PROOF of it behind. We have yet to see God's fingerprints in a verifiable way on any of this yet.
Yes, there are some really cool aspects of the world, and no- evolution does not have (nor claim to have) all of the answers. NO wise person claim perfect knowledge- and none of US should claim it either.
For ANY form of thesist evolution, such as ID to be PROVEN, we must find those places where God undeniably touched the process... but if He did it before the Big Bang (or however everything started), it will be hard to uncover any good proofs.
In the meantime, our goal should be less spreading more vague platitudes, and more about improving our knowledge (as individuals and as a society) about science, etc.
The old cartoon shows a complicated formula on a chalkboard, and right in the middle, there is a balloon that says "something miraculous happens here!". A scientist looking at it remarks to the one who wrote it "It looks a little vague there in the middle."
I think that we need to keep filling in these blanks and gaps in our knowledge- close in on that "and something miraculous happens' part. It is my personal belief that this will help us better define God's role.
Of course, even if we find a sound scientific solution for ALL of it, that would not automatically eliminate the possibility of God.
2006-06-26 13:05:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Madkins007 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i guess god just forgot to tell that to moses. and not to mention you can directly track adam the first man through his descendants pin pointing when god was said to have created the universe, and that was well after the dinosaurs, of which there is no mention... why?... because moses never saw a fossil. not to mention god makes light and plant life prior to the sun, and when he does finally make the sun he creates 2 luminaries, moses not knowing that the moons light is in fact reflected sunlight. creationists have realized that their theory has collapsed and unable to reconcile these blatent falsehoods, have decided to distance themselves from the bible, which by the way outright says that it is all inspired by god, and that you cannot add or take away from its content, so add away, just like the apocrapha was removed including half the book of esther, because they didn't like its polytheistic notions. evidence of the polytheism still exists however, for in the bible satan is still refered to as a god, but they lowercase it, and upercase it when they refer to the father "God", however ancient greek and hebrew did not have upper or lowercase. the bible is a story written long ago to instill fear in people to behave, because unlike today they did not possess vast policing resources. the conttradictions and immpossibilities through-out are uncountable, why does god ask adam "where are you?", how did noah fit any blue whales on the ark (every living thing right?) or do you think they survived when countless meters of fresh water was added to the ocean de-salinating it, or did he add salt water killing all fresh water animals. where did he keep their food and feces? an outdated fable, written by an intelligent going on the knowledge he had --his own.
2006-06-26 13:15:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by iconoclast_ensues 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The absence of proof doesn't prove something else. lol. Seriuosly, I suggest you take a scientific evolution course, rather than one based on theology. Even if you don't agree, at least your arguments would then make more sense as you would have *some* idea what you are talking about. lol. You probably should take a criticial thinking and writing course so that you can word your arguments more effectively. Right now, they aren't any type of valid argument.
2006-06-26 12:57:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ha Ha, I think there is some proven gaps in your logic! None of that proves anything about a god.
2006-06-26 12:55:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have proof you favor belief over fact:
You are putting forth fact and saying belief overcomes it
!!!! That PROVES !!! you don't value fact!!
Get a life.
2006-06-26 12:56:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
And your proof of this theory?
2006-06-26 12:54:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by You really_believe_that_shit? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
if only you could use your powers for good...very clever by the way
2006-06-26 12:58:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by bc_munkee 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
So, the proof is?
2006-06-26 12:59:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by thor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
HAHAHAHAHAHA Nonsense.
2006-06-26 12:55:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋